linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Make the 32-bit ARM get_user() and put_user() work for 16-bit quantities
@ 2013-10-29 16:52 William Cohen
  2013-10-29 17:49 ` Marc Zyngier
  2013-10-29 18:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: William Cohen @ 2013-10-29 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

The 32-bit ARM does not have instructions to perform 16-bit loads or
stores.  The __get_user_asm_half and __put_user_asm_half macros
sythesize those operations.  However, in most cases the pointers
passed into these macros are pointers to 16-bit types and the pointer
arithmetic will end up pointing at the next 16-bit quantity rather
than the second half (byte) of the 16-bit quantity.  The macros need
to explicitly typecast the pointers as pointers to 8-bit quantities to
make the pointer arithmetic work out properly.

Signed-off-by: William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 7e1f760..c2d9439 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -277,16 +277,16 @@ do {									\
 #define __get_user_asm_half(x,__gu_addr,err)			\
 ({								\
 	unsigned long __b1, __b2;				\
-	__get_user_asm_byte(__b1, __gu_addr, err);		\
-	__get_user_asm_byte(__b2, __gu_addr + 1, err);		\
+	__get_user_asm_byte(__b1, (u8 *)(__gu_addr), err);	\
+	__get_user_asm_byte(__b2, ((u8 *)(__gu_addr)) + 1, err);\
 	(x) = __b1 | (__b2 << 8);				\
 })
 #else
 #define __get_user_asm_half(x,__gu_addr,err)			\
 ({								\
 	unsigned long __b1, __b2;				\
-	__get_user_asm_byte(__b1, __gu_addr, err);		\
-	__get_user_asm_byte(__b2, __gu_addr + 1, err);		\
+	__get_user_asm_byte(__b1, (u8 *)(__gu_addr), err);	\
+	__get_user_asm_byte(__b2, ((u8 *)(__gu_addr)) + 1, err);\
 	(x) = (__b1 << 8) | __b2;				\
 })
 #endif
@@ -358,15 +358,15 @@ do {									\
 #define __put_user_asm_half(x,__pu_addr,err)			\
 ({								\
 	unsigned long __temp = (unsigned long)(x);		\
-	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp, __pu_addr, err);		\
-	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp >> 8, __pu_addr + 1, err);	\
+	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp, (u8 *)(__pu_addr), err);    \
+	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp >> 8, ((u8 *)(__pu_addr)) + 1, err);\
 })
 #else
 #define __put_user_asm_half(x,__pu_addr,err)			\
 ({								\
 	unsigned long __temp = (unsigned long)(x);		\
-	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp >> 8, __pu_addr, err);	\
-	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp, __pu_addr + 1, err);	\
+	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp >> 8, (u8 *)(__pu_addr), err);\
+	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp, ((u8 *)(__pu_addr)) + 1, err);\
 })
 #endif
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Make the 32-bit ARM get_user() and put_user() work for 16-bit quantities
  2013-10-29 16:52 [PATCH] Make the 32-bit ARM get_user() and put_user() work for 16-bit quantities William Cohen
@ 2013-10-29 17:49 ` Marc Zyngier
  2013-10-29 18:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2013-10-29 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hi William,

On 29/10/13 16:52, William Cohen wrote:
> The 32-bit ARM does not have instructions to perform 16-bit loads or
> stores.  The __get_user_asm_half and __put_user_asm_half macros
> sythesize those operations.  However, in most cases the pointers
> passed into these macros are pointers to 16-bit types and the pointer
> arithmetic will end up pointing at the next 16-bit quantity rather
> than the second half (byte) of the 16-bit quantity.  The macros need
> to explicitly typecast the pointers as pointers to 8-bit quantities to
> make the pointer arithmetic work out properly.

So I'm a bit perplex here. Looks like nobody but __{ge,pu}t_user_err
calls these macros directly, and the sole users cast the pointer to an
unsigned long, for which the arithmetic ought to work properly.

What am I missing?

	M.

> Signed-off-by: William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 7e1f760..c2d9439 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -277,16 +277,16 @@ do {									\
>  #define __get_user_asm_half(x,__gu_addr,err)			\
>  ({								\
>  	unsigned long __b1, __b2;				\
> -	__get_user_asm_byte(__b1, __gu_addr, err);		\
> -	__get_user_asm_byte(__b2, __gu_addr + 1, err);		\
> +	__get_user_asm_byte(__b1, (u8 *)(__gu_addr), err);	\
> +	__get_user_asm_byte(__b2, ((u8 *)(__gu_addr)) + 1, err);\
>  	(x) = __b1 | (__b2 << 8);				\
>  })
>  #else
>  #define __get_user_asm_half(x,__gu_addr,err)			\
>  ({								\
>  	unsigned long __b1, __b2;				\
> -	__get_user_asm_byte(__b1, __gu_addr, err);		\
> -	__get_user_asm_byte(__b2, __gu_addr + 1, err);		\
> +	__get_user_asm_byte(__b1, (u8 *)(__gu_addr), err);	\
> +	__get_user_asm_byte(__b2, ((u8 *)(__gu_addr)) + 1, err);\
>  	(x) = (__b1 << 8) | __b2;				\
>  })
>  #endif
> @@ -358,15 +358,15 @@ do {									\
>  #define __put_user_asm_half(x,__pu_addr,err)			\
>  ({								\
>  	unsigned long __temp = (unsigned long)(x);		\
> -	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp, __pu_addr, err);		\
> -	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp >> 8, __pu_addr + 1, err);	\
> +	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp, (u8 *)(__pu_addr), err);    \
> +	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp >> 8, ((u8 *)(__pu_addr)) + 1, err);\
>  })
>  #else
>  #define __put_user_asm_half(x,__pu_addr,err)			\
>  ({								\
>  	unsigned long __temp = (unsigned long)(x);		\
> -	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp >> 8, __pu_addr, err);	\
> -	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp, __pu_addr + 1, err);	\
> +	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp >> 8, (u8 *)(__pu_addr), err);\
> +	__put_user_asm_byte(__temp, ((u8 *)(__pu_addr)) + 1, err);\
>  })
>  #endif
>  
> 


-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Make the 32-bit ARM get_user() and put_user() work for 16-bit quantities
  2013-10-29 16:52 [PATCH] Make the 32-bit ARM get_user() and put_user() work for 16-bit quantities William Cohen
  2013-10-29 17:49 ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2013-10-29 18:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  2013-10-29 18:38   ` William Cohen
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2013-10-29 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:52:09PM -0400, William Cohen wrote:
> The 32-bit ARM does not have instructions to perform 16-bit loads or
> stores.  The __get_user_asm_half and __put_user_asm_half macros
> sythesize those operations.  However, in most cases the pointers
> passed into these macros are pointers to 16-bit types and the pointer
> arithmetic will end up pointing at the next 16-bit quantity rather
> than the second half (byte) of the 16-bit quantity.  The macros need
> to explicitly typecast the pointers as pointers to 8-bit quantities to
> make the pointer arithmetic work out properly.

NAK.

Nothing should be making use of these macros other than the other
macros in that file; these are implementation specific helper macros.
There, the address passed as __gu_addr and __pu_addr is an 'unsigned
long' quantity, so there is no concern about pointer arithmetic; they
do not take pointers.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Make the 32-bit ARM get_user() and put_user() work for 16-bit quantities
  2013-10-29 18:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2013-10-29 18:38   ` William Cohen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: William Cohen @ 2013-10-29 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 10/29/2013 02:04 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:52:09PM -0400, William Cohen wrote:
>> The 32-bit ARM does not have instructions to perform 16-bit loads or
>> stores.  The __get_user_asm_half and __put_user_asm_half macros
>> sythesize those operations.  However, in most cases the pointers
>> passed into these macros are pointers to 16-bit types and the pointer
>> arithmetic will end up pointing at the next 16-bit quantity rather
>> than the second half (byte) of the 16-bit quantity.  The macros need
>> to explicitly typecast the pointers as pointers to 8-bit quantities to
>> make the pointer arithmetic work out properly.
> 
> NAK.
> 
> Nothing should be making use of these macros other than the other
> macros in that file; these are implementation specific helper macros.
> There, the address passed as __gu_addr and __pu_addr is an 'unsigned
> long' quantity, so there is no concern about pointer arithmetic; they
> do not take pointers.
> 

You are correct.  systemtap had had macros that were based on the arm uaccess.h macos, but they were missing the typecasts that __get_user_err and __put_user_err.  Thanks for pointing out my error.

-Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-29 18:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-29 16:52 [PATCH] Make the 32-bit ARM get_user() and put_user() work for 16-bit quantities William Cohen
2013-10-29 17:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-10-29 18:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-29 18:38   ` William Cohen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).