From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 11:19:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] clocksource: sun4i: change CPU mask to cpu_possible_mask In-Reply-To: <1382699771-4396-3-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> References: <1382699771-4396-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1382699771-4396-3-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <527B693D.9010304@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/25/2013 01:16 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > The interrupt for the timer is a shared processor interrupt, so any CPU > found in the system can handle it. Switch to our cpumask to > cpu_possible_mask instead of cpumask_of(0). > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard Applied to my tree for 3.14 Thanks ! sidenote: did you look at the CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DYNIRQ flag ? It may reduce the number of wakeup for your system. > --- > drivers/clocksource/sun4i_timer.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/sun4i_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/sun4i_timer.c > index a7f492e..6a76b4e 100644 > --- a/drivers/clocksource/sun4i_timer.c > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/sun4i_timer.c > @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static void __init sun4i_timer_init(struct device_node *node) > val = readl(timer_base + TIMER_IRQ_EN_REG); > writel(val | TIMER_IRQ_EN(0), timer_base + TIMER_IRQ_EN_REG); > > - sun4i_clockevent.cpumask = cpumask_of(0); > + sun4i_clockevent.cpumask = cpu_possible_mask; > sun4i_clockevent.irq = irq; > > clockevents_config_and_register(&sun4i_clockevent, rate, > -- Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog