From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: chris.ruehl@gtsys.com.hk (Chris Ruehl) Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:33:24 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] usb: chipidea: usbmisc: Add support for i.MX27/i.MX31 CPUs In-Reply-To: <1384145140.400290349@f353.i.mail.ru> References: <1384067901-9377-1-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> <5280414C.3060806@gtsys.com.hk> <1384145140.400290349@f353.i.mail.ru> Message-ID: <52806C24.8040100@gtsys.com.hk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday, November 11, 2013 12:45 PM, Alexander Shiyan wrote: >> Hi Alexander, >> >> On Sunday, November 10, 2013 03:18 PM, Alexander Shiyan wrote: >>> This adds i.MX27 and i.MX31 as the next user of the usbmisc driver. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan >>> --- >>> drivers/usb/chipidea/usbmisc_imx.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/usbmisc_imx.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/usbmisc_imx.c > ... >>> +static int usbmisc_imx27_init(struct imx_usbmisc_data *data) >>> +{ >>> + unsigned long flags; >>> + u32 val; >>> + >>> + switch (data->index) { >>> + case 0: >>> + val = MX27_OTG_PM_BIT; >>> + break; >>> + case 1: >>> + val = MX27_H1_PM_BIT; >>> + break; >>> + case 2: >>> + val = MX27_H2_PM_BIT; >>> + break; >>> + default: >>> + return -EINVAL; >>> + }; >>> + >> >> From my understanding this can not work, the usbmisc->base not point into the >> usb control register (USB_CTRL). Reference manual 30.5.1.1 says >> BASE + 0x600 >> you must add the offset to the readl instruction. > > Why not work? > usbotg: usb at 10024000 > usbh1: usb at 10024200 > usbh2: usb at 10024400 > usbmisc: usbmisc at 10024600 > So, offset to USB_CTRL should already be defined by DTS. in the usbmisc_imx_probe() the base pointer is loaded from res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); data->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); (and I did not see any of_ operations) usbmisc = data; base is set to 0x10024000 when I look around all other functions init functions did a offset calculation. > > >>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&usbmisc->lock, flags); >>> + if (data->disable_oc) >>> + val = readl(usbmisc->base) | val; >> >> else part not needed, the registers bits are set to 0 (reset) >> the function is called on start-up once only, right?! >> >>> + else >>> + val = readl(usbmisc->base)& ~val; >>> + writel(val, usbmisc->base); >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&usbmisc->lock, flags); >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> +} > > Bit can be set/cleared wrongly by the bootloader, it is not a big > overhead to set it in proper state. > ohh, yes that true! > ... >