From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use udiv/sdiv for __aeabi_{u}idiv library functions
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:34:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <528193A0.7050505@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1311092357090.2314@knanqh.ubzr>
On 11/09/13 21:03, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Bah..... NAK. We are doing runtime patching of the kernel for many
> many things already. So why not do the same here?
static keys are a form of runtime patching, albeit not as extreme as
you're suggesting.
>
> The obvious strategy is to simply overwrite the start of the existing
> __aeabi_idiv code with the "sdiv r0, r0, r1" and "bx lr" opcodes.
>
> Similarly for the unsigned case.
I was thinking the same thing when I wrote this, but I didn't know how
to tell the compiler to either inline this function or to let me inilne
an assembly stub with some section magic.
>
> That let you test the hardware capability only once during boot instead
> of everytime a divide operation is performed.
The test for hardware capability really isn't done more than once during
boot. The assembly is like so at compile time
00000000 <__aeabi_idiv>:
0: nop {0}
4: b 0 <___aeabi_idiv>
8: sdiv r0, r0, r1
c: bx lr
and after we test and find support for the instruction it will be
replaced with
00000000 <__aeabi_idiv>:
0: b 8
4: b 0 <___aeabi_idiv>
8: sdiv r0, r0, r1
c: bx lr
Unfortunately we still have to jump to this function. It would be great
if we could inline this function at the call site but as I already said
I don't know how to do that.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-12 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-08 23:00 [PATCH v2] ARM: Use udiv/sdiv for __aeabi_{u}idiv library functions Stephen Boyd
2013-11-09 6:46 ` Matt Sealey
2013-11-09 18:20 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-11-12 1:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-10 5:03 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-12 2:34 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-11-12 11:28 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-11-12 14:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-12 14:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-12 14:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-12 14:17 ` Ben Dooks
2013-11-12 14:32 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-12 14:40 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-11-12 14:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-12 15:20 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-12 18:03 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-11-12 14:22 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-11-12 14:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-11 7:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-11-12 2:35 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=528193A0.7050505@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).