From: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com (Masami Hiramatsu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/6] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:27:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5281D848.7000502@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+b37P08cLAvBYAXSkozLPzrpuXn=N0SUetwL6N8JL+10AtYjQ@mail.gmail.com>
(2013/11/12 15:23), Sandeepa Prabhu wrote:
>>>> OK, I've ensured that the hw_breakpoint (from perf) can work
>>>> with kprobes (from ftrace) at the same address on x86.
>>>> So if arm64 already support hw_breakpoint on perf, kprobes should
>>>> work with it.
>>>
>>> Single-stepping on x86 is different to the step behaviour on arm64 afaik. On
>>> ARM, we have to manually remove the breakpoint, perform a single-step, then
>>> add the breakpoint again. If we re-enable debug exceptions in the kprobe
>>> handler, the step will complete early and we'll never step off the
>>> breakpoint.
>>
>> I'm unsure about arm64's debug feature behavior, what does happen when
>> it performs a single-step on sw-breakpoint?
>>
>>> Sandeepa: I think you need to retry Masami's test on the arm64 model, since
>>> I'm fairly sure it won't work as expected without some additional code.
>>
>> OK, anyway, for testing same one, we need to port ftrace first. So the next
Sorry for confusion, s/next/fallback is what I meant. Making a kprobe module
can be done without ftrace port.
>> plan is to make a kprobe module to put a probe (which just printk something)
>> on a specific function (e.g. vfs_symlink), and run perf record with
>> hw-breakpoint as below
>>
>> $ perf record -e "mem:0xXXXXXX:k" ln -s /dev/null /tmp/foo
>>
>> Note that 0xXXXXXX is the address of vfs_symlink.
>>
>> After that, you can see the message in dmesg and also check the perf result
>> with "sudo perf script --dump" (you can find a PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE entry if
>> it works)
> Thanks for steps, ARM64 ftrace patches are under review on arm mailing
> list, I can contact the (linaro) developer implementing ftrace on
> what's supported and then figure-out a way to test this concurrency of
> kprobes breakpoint and hardware breakpoint.
Would you mean this? :)
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg278477.html
Wow, it seems that this also has some works around instruction
manipulation (and confusable filenames...)
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt at hitachi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-12 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-17 11:17 [PATCH RFC v2 0/6] ARM64: Add kernel probes(Kprobes) support Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC v4 1/6] arm64: support single-step and breakpoint handler hooks Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-25 15:22 ` Will Deacon
2013-12-03 14:33 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-12-03 19:44 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-08 16:56 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-09 9:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-11 5:39 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-11 7:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-11 10:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-11 10:58 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 17:32 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-12 6:23 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-12 7:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2013-11-12 8:44 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-12 10:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-12 10:55 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-12 14:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-12 16:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-13 16:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
[not found] ` <CA+b37P1sNsEXrJFfVL51sZ-SeGNCBiwXnOwCiFY8CBwSXPw+mQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-11-13 7:08 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-13 14:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-13 14:31 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-13 15:55 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-15 16:39 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-18 6:55 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-18 8:51 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-13 13:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-13 14:20 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 5:35 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-11 11:21 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-12 6:52 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-15 16:37 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-18 6:43 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] arm64: Kprobes instruction simulation support Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-08 17:03 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 5:58 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] arm64: Add kernel return probes support(kretprobes) Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-08 17:04 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 4:29 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-11 7:53 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2013-11-11 8:55 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] arm64: Enable kprobes support for arm64 platform Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] kprobes: Add cases for arm and arm64 in sample module Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-25 15:24 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-06 11:05 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-18 8:32 ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/6] ARM64: Add kernel probes(Kprobes) support Masami Hiramatsu
2013-10-21 4:17 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5281D848.7000502@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).