From: ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk (Ben Dooks)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use udiv/sdiv for __aeabi_{u}idiv library functions
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:17:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52823877.60806@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131112140436.GK16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 12/11/13 14:04, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 09:01:16AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> What about this patch which I think is currently your best option. Note
>> it would need to use the facilities from asm/opcodes.h to make it endian
>> agnostic.
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
>> index 6a1b8a81b1..379cffe4ab 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
>> @@ -383,6 +383,34 @@ static void __init cpuid_init_hwcaps(void)
>> elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_IDIVT;
>> }
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Patch our division routines with the corresponding opcode
>> + * if the hardware supports it.
>> + */
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL) && (elf_hwcap & HWCAP_IDIVT)) {
>> + extern char __aeabi_uidiv, __aeabi_idiv;
>> + u16 *uidiv = (u16 *)&__aeabi_uidiv;
>> + u16 *idiv = (u16 *)&__aeabi_idiv;
>> +
>> + uidiv[0] = 0xfbb0; /* udiv r0, r0, r1 */
>> + uidiv[1] = 0xf0f1;
>> + uidiv[2] = 0x4770; /* bx lr */
>> +
>> + idiv[0] = 0xfb90; /* sdiv r0, r0, r1 */
>> + idiv[1] = 0xf0f1;
>> + idiv[2] = 0x4770; /* bx lr */
>> + } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL) && (elf_hwcap & HWCAP_IDIVA)) {
>> + extern char __aeabi_uidiv, __aeabi_idiv;
>> + u32 *uidiv = (u32 *)&__aeabi_uidiv;
>> + u32 *idiv = (u32 *)&__aeabi_idiv;
>> +
>> + uidiv[0] = 0xe730f110; /* udiv r0, r0, r1 */
>> + uidiv[1] = 0xe12fff1e; /* bx lr */
>> +
>> + idiv[0] = 0xe710f110; /* sdiv r0, r0, r1 */
>> + idiv[1] = 0xe12fff1e; /* bx lr */
>> + }
>
> What about endianness, and what if XIP is enabled?
I was also going to add a note about endian-ness.
Given these are single instructoins for ARM, is it possible we could
make a table of all the callers and fix them up when we initialise
as we do for the SMP/UP case and for page-offset?
--
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-12 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-08 23:00 [PATCH v2] ARM: Use udiv/sdiv for __aeabi_{u}idiv library functions Stephen Boyd
2013-11-09 6:46 ` Matt Sealey
2013-11-09 18:20 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-11-12 1:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-10 5:03 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-12 2:34 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-12 11:28 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-11-12 14:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-12 14:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-12 14:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-12 14:17 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2013-11-12 14:32 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-12 14:40 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-11-12 14:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-12 15:20 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-12 18:03 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-11-12 14:22 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-11-12 14:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-11 7:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-11-12 2:35 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52823877.60806@codethink.co.uk \
--to=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).