From: taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org (Taras Kondratiuk)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: kexec: Use the right ISA for relocate_new_kernel
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:28:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52860555.7010307@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5282818B.9030903@linaro.org>
On 11/12/2013 09:29 PM, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
> Hi Dave
>
> Yes. I've tested it on Pandaboard and results are quite weird.
> ARM->ARM, Thumb->Thumb and Thumb->ARM kernel transition works fine
> for both kexec and kdump ways. But ARM->Thumb works for only kdump
> via kernel panic. In case of "kexec -e" the second Thumb kernel
> doesn't come up.
>
> I don't have JTAG now. I will check this tomorrow morning.
Hi Dave, Will
The issue I observed is not caused by this patch.
I was able to reproduce it with my initial simple patch.
So for this one:
Reported-and-Tested-by: Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org>
And the issue I'm frequently facing in reloaded kernel (Thumb from ARM)
is random crashes caused by undefined instructions.
My observation summary:
- Before starting a second kernel I'm dumping loaded zImage and then
unpacked Image at final location and they are correct, so no issue
with loading.
- I observe two types of crash:
1) Undefined instruction in the middle of kernel code. After a crash
I check failing address and there is always a *valid* Thumb
instruction (CPU is in Thumb mode).
2) Jump to a wrong address which consequently causes undefined
instruction exception. A trace of one example of a wrong jump is
captured in [1]. Instead of jumping to 0xC049097C code gets
executed at 0xED85E008. BTW the wrong address suspiciously looks
like an ARM instruction.
- If second kernel is placed at different address (like in kdump case),
then it boots fine and I don't observe any crashes.
- If I check failing address in the first kernel (ARM) the code there
is really undefined instruction if executed as Thumb.
- Looks like pieces of old ARM kernel gets executed instead of new
Thumb kernel. But as I've mentioned I'm reading physical memory via
JTAG before starting second kernel and memory is matching a compiled
Thumb 'Image'. Icache also gets cleaned...
- Once when stopped on breakpoint I've seen a piece of ARM code in
Thumb kernel. Interesting that I was looking at the same memory
location via physical and virtual addresses simultaneously and only
virtual address showed an old code. After a few memory browsing
operations, data at both addresses got synced to correct Thumb code.
Sure it could be a debugger lag, but it fits nicely with other
observations.
Do you have some ideas what could cause such behavior?
Unfortunately I don't have more time now to debug it further,
but I will try to return to this later.
[1]
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByfnRzd5ZYtdQWJKc1k0VmxrZlE/edit?usp=sharing
--
Taras Kondratiuk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-15 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-08 12:24 [PATCH v2] ARM: kexec: Use the right ISA for relocate_new_kernel Dave Martin
2013-11-08 13:34 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-08 18:46 ` Dave Martin
2013-11-12 19:29 ` Taras Kondratiuk
2013-11-15 11:28 ` Taras Kondratiuk [this message]
2013-11-15 17:38 ` Dave Martin
2013-11-15 18:11 ` Taras Kondratiuk
2013-11-15 18:33 ` Dave P Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52860555.7010307@linaro.org \
--to=taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).