From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:53:33 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL]clocksource: dw_apb_timer_of: Fix read_sched_clock In-Reply-To: <52917B22.3040205@gmail.com> References: <1381159679-6528-1-git-send-email-dinguyen@altera.com> <5252DCB6.3070805@linaro.org> <5252EB22.2050506@linaro.org> <52530903.4090709@linaro.org> <52917B22.3040205@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5292755D.3050000@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/24/2013 05:05 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 10/7/13 2:18 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 10/07/2013 07:10 PM, John Stultz wrote: >>> On 10/07/2013 09:09 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>> On 10/07/2013 05:27 PM, dinguyen at altera.com wrote: >>>>> From: Dinh Nguyen >>>>> >>>>> Hi Thomas, John, >>>>> >>>>> I am hoping you can pull in these 2 patches. These 2 patches have >>>>> been floating >>>>> around for almost 2 months now. They are needed to get the Altera >>>>> SOCFPGA >>>>> booting again because of a DTS binding change in 3.12. >>>>> >>>>> The other change was correctly return the current clock counter. >>>>> >>>>> The discussion thread can be found here: >>>>> >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-September/198818.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-September/198903.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This patch does not attempt or change the behaviour of the ordering >>>>> of how a >>>>> clocksource or clockevent is use. These 2 patches only enables a >>>>> platform to boot. >>>> >>>> John, >>>> >>>> I agree with Dinh, these patches fixes a boot issue on Altera SOCFPGA >>>> and should be merged. >>>> >>> >>> Hey Dinh, >>> Thanks for persisting here! Sorry this has taken awhile. Just as an >>> FYI, Daniel is maintaining the drivers/clocksource dir these days. >>> >>> So, I've not been following this closely, but if I recall we had a merge >>> conflict that we backed out, since it seemed that everyone involved in >>> this driver weren't working together. Then Thomas had some objections, >>> but it *looks* like that's been resolved. So I don't have any objections >>> at this point. >> >> Yeah, it happens the same to me :) >> >>> Daniel: if you want to pull these in to your tree, that's fine by me. >> >> Ok, pulled to my tree. > I did not see these 2 patches in 3.13-rc1. Just wondering what happened > to them? Me too :/ I will take them for 3.13 fixes. -- Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog