From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:47:30 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 11/31] dma: add channel request API that supports deferred probe In-Reply-To: References: <528D28A1.2050307@wwwdotorg.org> <528E4F55.9070204@wwwdotorg.org> <528F95A9.2050305@wwwdotorg.org> <528F9DF9.6080706@wwwdotorg.org> <20131123003442.GH16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <5293883A.8050808@wwwdotorg.org> <20131125180000.GR16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <52939E67.6040300@wwwdotorg.org> <5293A573.2050704@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <5293A952.5070602@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/25/2013 12:45 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> 2) What's the final call on the new API name? > > What do you think of _reason? I just read the existence of > dma_request_slave_channel_or_err() as an implication that > dma_request_slave_channel() may not fail. OK, _reason makes good sense. Thanks. >> Just let me know on both - the changes are simple. Thanks. > > Well thanks for hashing this back and forth, we can laugh about it > over a drink at the next conference. :-)