From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pwalmsley@nvidia.com (Paul Walmsley)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:03:06 -0800
Subject: clk: clk_round_rate() should return 0, not negative numbers,
 upon error
In-Reply-To: <20131126000153.GY16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1311251553080.23090@tamien>
 <20131126000153.GY16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <5293E53A.5050103@nvidia.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 11/25/2013 04:01 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 03:55:33PM -0800, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>> Update the documentation for clk_round_rate() to state that it should
>> return 0 rather than a negative error code when it encounters an
>> error.  This describes how the common clock framework currently works;
>> howeever, some clock code does not yet align to this.
>>
>> This change is to prepare for returning unsigned values from
>> clk_round_rate().
> You really ought to document why this is being changed here, to help
> sell the change to parties who are not aware of the background.
> Otherwise, it just looks like a gratuitous API change.

Will do and resend.

- Paul