From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:08:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v7 11/17] Documentation: phy: add document for rockchip dp phy In-Reply-To: <1445656003-15300-1-git-send-email-ykk@rock-chips.com> References: <1445599415-30856-1-git-send-email-ykk@rock-chips.com> <1445656003-15300-1-git-send-email-ykk@rock-chips.com> Message-ID: <5298205.Ylro4gBPnU@phil> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Samstag, 24. Oktober 2015, 11:06:37 schrieb Yakir Yang: > Add dt binding documentation for rockchip display port PHY. > > Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang > --- > Changes in v7: None > Changes in v6: None > Changes in v5: > - Split binding doc's from driver changes. (Rob) > - Update the rockchip,grf explain in document, and correct the clock required > elemets in document. (Rob & Heiko) > > Changes in v4: None > Changes in v3: None > Changes in v2: None > > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..505194e > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ > +Rockchip Soc Seroes Display Port PHY > +------------------------------------ > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible : should be one of the following supported values: > + - "rockchip.rk3288-dp-phy" > +- clocks: from common clock binding: handle to dp clock. > + of memory mapped region. > +- clock-names: from common clock binding: > + Required elements: "24m" > +- rockchip,grf: phandle to the syscon managing the "general register files" > +- #phy-cells : from the generic PHY bindings, must be 0; > + > +Example: > + > +edp_phy: edp-phy at ff770274 { one small thing, I found while playing more ... the node should not have an address, as it also does not have register property. So just name it edp_phy: edp-phy { ... }; There is only one anyway on the rk3288. With that change the Reviewed-by still applies :-) > + compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-dp-phy"; > + rockchip,grf = <&grf>; > + clocks = <&cru SCLK_EDP_24M>; > + clock-names = "24m"; > + #phy-cells = <0>; > +}; >