From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lars@metafoo.de (Lars-Peter Clausen) Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:15:50 +0100 Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation In-Reply-To: <20131203120420.GC12031@lee--X1> References: <1386066427-6862-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <529DC6BE.3080607@metafoo.de> <20131203120420.GC12031@lee--X1> Message-ID: <529DCB76.4070705@metafoo.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/03/2013 01:04 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > >> On 12/03/2013 11:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA too, the last piece of the >>> puzzle), then we don't need to use the compatible_request_channel call >>> back or require some of the historical bumph which probably isn't >>> required by a platform data start-up now either. This will also be >>> ripped out in upcoming commits. >>> >>> Cc: alsa-devel at alsa-project.org >>> Acked-by: Linus Walleij >>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones >> >> Strictly speaking you do not need the second config, but well considering >> that this will all hopefully be removed soon anyway it should be fine. > > That's true it will, but why don't we need the second config? I won't > want the compat function to be called in the DT case. It will only be called if it was not possible to request the DMA channel from the DT. - Lars