From: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] OF: base: match each node compatible against all given matches first
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 23:55:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529E614B.3070307@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1312032210480.25191@math.ut.ee>
On 12/03/2013 09:14 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
>> Currently, of_match_node compares each given match against all node's
>> compatible strings with of_device_is_compatible.
>>
>> To achieve multiple compatible strings per node with ordering from
>> specific to generic, this requires given matches to be ordered from
>> specific to generic. For most of the drivers this is not true and also
>> an alphabetical ordering is more sane there.
>>
>> Therefore, this patch modifies of_match_node to match each of the node's
>> compatible strings against all given matches first, before checking the
>> next compatible string. This implies that node's compatibles are ordered
>> from specific to generic while given matches can be in any order.
>
> I think I am on the CC: list because of a CPU detection problem report
> on sparc64 (183912d352a242a276a7877852f107459a13aff9 (of: move
> of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library) caused trouble and
The reason you are on Cc is that Thierry added you on last patch
version. I cannot see how above commit should be related with this
one, but maybe Thierry can comment on it.
> was reverted). So while your V2 patch does not cause any visible harm on
> the same Sun E3500, my gut feeling is that an additional patch would be
> needed to actually test it (a patch like
> 183912d352a242a276a7877852f107459a13aff9).
This patch deals with matching a node with more than one compatible
string on a (unordered) list of matches. Although not related to your
issue, it is good to hear that it causes no harm on DT-mature archs :)
I tested it with ARM and l2x0 cache controllers, where the specific
of_device_id (marvell,tauros3-cache) is sorted after the generic
one (arm,pl310-cache). The corresponding node's property is
compatible = "marvell,tauros3-cache", "arm,pl310-cache".
Without this patch, of_match_node always hits the first match that
equals _any_ of the above compatible strings. With this patch, it
hits the matches _in order_ of the compatible strings.
> Is this correct or am I missing something?
Thierry?
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> v1->v2:
>> - Allow checks against nodes with no compatible (Reported by Rob Herring)
>> - Add some comments
>>
>> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
>> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
>> Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
>> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
>> Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> drivers/of/base.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
>> index f807d0e..8d007d8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
>> @@ -731,24 +731,42 @@ static
>> const struct of_device_id *__of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
>> const struct device_node *node)
>> {
>> + const char *cp;
>> + int cplen, l;
>> +
>> if (!matches)
>> return NULL;
>>
>> - while (matches->name[0] || matches->type[0] || matches->compatible[0]) {
>> - int match = 1;
>> - if (matches->name[0])
>> - match &= node->name
>> - && !strcmp(matches->name, node->name);
>> - if (matches->type[0])
>> - match &= node->type
>> - && !strcmp(matches->type, node->type);
>> - if (matches->compatible[0])
>> - match &= __of_device_is_compatible(node,
>> - matches->compatible);
>> - if (match)
>> - return matches;
>> - matches++;
>> - }
>> + cp = __of_get_property(node, "compatible", &cplen);
>> + do {
>> + const struct of_device_id *m = matches;
>> +
>> + /* Check against matches with current compatible string */
>> + while (m->name[0] || m->type[0] || m->compatible[0]) {
>> + int match = 1;
>> + if (m->name[0])
>> + match &= node->name
>> + && !strcmp(m->name, node->name);
>> + if (m->type[0])
>> + match &= node->type
>> + && !strcmp(m->type, node->type);
>> + if (m->compatible[0])
>> + match &= cp
>> + && !of_compat_cmp(m->compatible, cp,
>> + strlen(m->compatible));
>> + if (match)
>> + return m;
>> + m++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Get node's next compatible string */
>> + if (cp) {
>> + l = strlen(cp) + 1;
>> + cp += l;
>> + cplen -= l;
>> + }
>> + } while (cp && (cplen > 0));
>> +
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -757,7 +775,10 @@ const struct of_device_id *__of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
>> * @matches: array of of device match structures to search in
>> * @node: the of device structure to match against
>> *
>> - * Low level utility function used by device matching.
>> + * Low level utility function used by device matching. Matching order
>> + * is to compare each of the node's compatibles with all given matches
>> + * first. This implies node's compatible is sorted from specific to
>> + * generic while matches can be in any order.
>> */
>> const struct of_device_id *of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
>> const struct device_node *node)
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-03 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-28 18:36 [PATCH] OF: base: match each node compatible against all given matches first Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-12-02 12:03 ` Thierry Reding
2013-12-02 14:00 ` Rob Herring
2013-12-02 14:09 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-12-03 13:52 ` [PATCH v2] " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-12-03 20:14 ` Meelis Roos
2013-12-03 22:55 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth [this message]
2013-12-04 9:40 ` Thierry Reding
2013-12-04 13:08 ` Meelis Roos
2013-12-04 14:04 ` Thierry Reding
2013-12-04 19:23 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=529E614B.3070307@gmail.com \
--to=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).