From: dinh.linux@gmail.com (Dinh Nguyen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: socfpga: Map the clk manager base address in the clock driver
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 17:04:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A64C89.2030100@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201312092231.13441.arnd@arndb.de>
On 12/9/13 3:31 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 09 December 2013, dinguyen at altera.com wrote:
>> From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@altera.com>
>>
>> The clk manager's base address was being mapped in SOCFPGA's arch code and
>> being extern'ed out to the clock driver. This method is not correct, and the
>> arch code was not really doing anything with that clk manager anyways.
>>
>> This patch moves the mapping of the clk manager's base address in the clock
>> driver itself.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@altera.com>
> Ok, thanks for doing this cleanup. A few comments for further simplification:
>
>> -extern void __iomem *clk_mgr_base_addr;
>> -
>> struct socfpga_clk {
>> struct clk_gate hw;
>> char *parent_name;
>> char *clk_name;
>> + void __iomem *clk_mgr_base_addr;
>> u32 fixed_div;
>> void __iomem *div_reg;
>> u32 width; /* only valid if div_reg != 0 */
>
> I think there is no need to make this a per-clock field, it's fine to
> have a 'static' variable in the place of the 'extern' declaration you have now.
Ok.
>
>> @@ -129,7 +130,11 @@ static __init struct clk *socfpga_clk_init(struct device_node *node,
>> if (WARN_ON(!socfpga_clk))
>> return NULL;
>>
>> - socfpga_clk->hw.reg = clk_mgr_base_addr + reg;
>> + /* Map the clk manager register */
>> + clk_mgr_np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "altr,clk-mgr");
>> + socfpga_clk->hw.reg = of_iomap(clk_mgr_np, 0);
>> + BUG_ON(!socfpga_clk->hw.reg);
>> + socfpga_clk->hw.reg += reg;
>>
>> rc = of_property_read_u32(node, "fixed-divider", &fixed_div);
>> if (rc)
> Instead of mapping it every time, I suggest something along the lines of
> this patch:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/socfpga/clk.c b/drivers/clk/socfpga/clk.c
> index 81dd31a..1a14742 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/socfpga/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/socfpga/clk.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
> #define div_mask(width) ((1 << (width)) - 1)
> #define streq(a, b) (strcmp((a), (b)) == 0)
>
> -extern void __iomem *clk_mgr_base_addr;
> +static void __iomem *clk_mgr_base_addr;
>
> struct socfpga_clk {
> struct clk_gate hw;
> @@ -322,19 +322,30 @@ static void __init socfpga_pll_init(struct device_node *node)
> {
> socfpga_clk_init(node, &clk_pll_ops);
> }
> -CLK_OF_DECLARE(socfpga_pll, "altr,socfpga-pll-clock", socfpga_pll_init);
>
> static void __init socfpga_periph_init(struct device_node *node)
> {
> socfpga_clk_init(node, &periclk_ops);
> }
> -CLK_OF_DECLARE(socfpga_periph, "altr,socfpga-perip-clk", socfpga_periph_init);
>
> static void __init socfpga_gate_init(struct device_node *node)
> {
> socfpga_gate_clk_init(node, &gateclk_ops);
> }
> -CLK_OF_DECLARE(socfpga_gate, "altr,socfpga-gate-clk", socfpga_gate_init);
> +
> +static struct of_device_id socfpga_child_clocks[] = {
> + { "altr,socfpga-pll-clock", socfpga_pll_init },
> + { "altr,socfpga-perip-clk", socfpga_periph_init },
> + { "altr,socfpga-gate-clk", socfpga_gate_init },
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +static void __init socfpga_pll_init(struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + clk_mgr_base_addr = of_iomap(node, 0);
> + of_clk_init(socfpga_child_clocks);
> +}
> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(socfpga_mgr, "altr,clk-mgr", socfpga_clkmgr_init);
>
> void __init socfpga_init_clocks(void)
> {
>
>
> On a related note, I'd also like to see socfpga_init_clocks() disappear. It should
> be trivial to just add the "mpuclk" into the DT as a separate
> compatible = "fixed-factor-clock" node.
Please see:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-December/216664.html
Thanks for the review.
Dinh
>
> Arnd
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-09 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-09 19:30 [PATCH] clk: socfpga: Map the clk manager base address in the clock driver dinguyen at altera.com
2013-12-09 21:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-09 23:04 ` Dinh Nguyen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A64C89.2030100@gmail.com \
--to=dinh.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).