From: lauraa@codeaurora.org (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Correct virt_addr_valid
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:35:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A8A256.3080801@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131211104429.GE26730@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
On 12/11/2013 2:44 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 01:23:02AM +0000, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> The definition of virt_addr_valid is that virt_addr_valid should
>> return true if and only if virt_to_page returns a valid pointer.
>> The current definition of virt_addr_valid only checks against the
>> virtual address range. There's no guarantee that just because a
>> virtual address falls bewteen PAGE_OFFSET and high_memory the
>> associated physical memory has a valid backing struct page. Follow
>> the example of other architectures and convert to pfn_valid to
>> verify that the virtual address is actually valid.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 3 +--
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
>> index 3776217..9dc5dc3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
>> @@ -146,8 +146,7 @@ static inline void *phys_to_virt(phys_addr_t x)
>> #define ARCH_PFN_OFFSET PHYS_PFN_OFFSET
>>
>> #define virt_to_page(kaddr) pfn_to_page(__pa(kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
>> -#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) (((void *)(kaddr) >= (void *)PAGE_OFFSET) && \
>> - ((void *)(kaddr) < (void *)high_memory))
>> +#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) pfn_valid(__pa(kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
>
> Hmm, this is pretty expensive on both arm and arm64, since we end up doing a
> binary search through all of the memblocks.
>
> Are you seeing real problems with the current code?
>
No, thankfully I'm not seeing actual problems at the moment. I found
this while looking at other code. It's also worth noting that almost all
other architectures use this same code as well so I don't see this as
something that would be uniquely bad on ARM.
> Will
>
Laura
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-11 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-11 1:23 [PATCH] arm: Correct virt_addr_valid Laura Abbott
2013-12-11 1:23 ` [PATCH] arm64: " Laura Abbott
2013-12-11 10:44 ` Will Deacon
2013-12-11 11:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-12-11 17:26 ` Will Deacon
2013-12-11 21:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-12-12 17:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-12 18:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-12-12 22:09 ` Laura Abbott
2013-12-13 11:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-16 18:28 ` Laura Abbott
2013-12-17 14:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-11 17:35 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A8A256.3080801@codeaurora.org \
--to=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).