From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: liuj97@gmail.com (Jiang Liu) Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:07:25 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v6 6/7] arm64, jump label: optimize jump label implementation In-Reply-To: <20131213105223.664f960b@gandalf.local.home> References: <1386691433-6827-1-git-send-email-liuj97@gmail.com> <1386691433-6827-7-git-send-email-liuj97@gmail.com> <20131213154104.GG19177@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <20131213105023.67e45640@gandalf.local.home> <20131213105223.664f960b@gandalf.local.home> Message-ID: <52AD8D6D.6090303@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/13/2013 11:52 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:50:23 -0500 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > >> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:41:04 +0000 >> Will Deacon wrote: >> >>>> +#include >>>> +#include >>>> +#include >>>> +#include >>>> + >>>> +#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL >>> >>> Slightly worrying... this should be CONFIG_HAVE_JUMP_LABEL, right? How did >>> you manage to test this code? >> >> In we have: >> >> #if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL) >> >> [...] >> >> # include > > This also makes the include of in the C file > redundant. > > -- Steve Thanks, Steve. Will remove the redundant include header file. > >> # define HAVE_JUMP_LABEL >> #endif /* CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO && CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL */ >> >> >> -- Steve >