From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: monstr@monstr.eu (Michal Simek) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:06:03 +0100 Subject: arm-soc: Xilinx Zynq dt changes for v3.14 In-Reply-To: <20131217202731.GA11452@quad.lixom.net> References: <52AAC671.6000207@monstr.eu> <20131213112659.GD4360@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <52AB0ABD.1050307@monstr.eu> <20131217202731.GA11452@quad.lixom.net> Message-ID: <52B1657B.1030803@monstr.eu> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/17/2013 09:27 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:25:17PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: >> Hi Russell, >> >> On 12/13/2013 12:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>> 1. Address it to arm at kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people >>> individually. The whole point of arm at kernel.org is that it reaches >>> the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that >>> you send your email without you needing to know who they are. >>> >>> 2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as >>> a pull request message. >> >> Thanks, I will keep this in my mind for future. I am just doing what I have done >> before and this is the first complain I have got. > > I don't think I've noticed it in the past. :-) Either way, see it as a > friendly pointer from Russell, not a complaint. that's how I take it. The point here is just if I should send pull request again. Thanks, Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 263 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: