From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:20:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] misc: fuse: Add efuse driver for Tegra
In-Reply-To: <20131219175931.GA18004@kroah.com>
References: <1387468474-26521-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
 <1387468474-26521-3-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
 <20131219175931.GA18004@kroah.com>
Message-ID: <52B346E1.2030508@wwwdotorg.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 12/19/2013 10:59 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 05:54:30PM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote:

>> +	pr_info("Tegra Revision: %s SKU: %d CPU Process: %d Core Process: %d\n",
>> +		tegra_revision_name[sku_info->revision],
>> +		sku_info->sku_id, sku_info->cpu_process_id,
>> +		sku_info->core_process_id);
> 
> Why pollute the kernel log with this type of thing?  Who really needs
> it?

We already print this; I guess this series is just moving where that
happens. It has proved useful to me in the past so I know which chip rev
I'm using, but I guess if this all gets exported to sysfs somewhere else
in this series, I could just go read those files in the future...