From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com (Sylwester Nawrocki) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 23:23:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Kill exynos_pm_late_initcall() In-Reply-To: <52B4B861.2050506@samsung.com> References: <1387574758-28489-1-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> <52B4B861.2050506@samsung.com> Message-ID: <52B4C34F.10207@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/20/2013 10:36 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 12/21/13 06:25, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> The only thing exynos_pm_late_initcall() does is calling >> pm_genpd_poweroff_unused(), which is already stubbed when >> CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS is not enabled. So replace >> exynos_pm_late_initcall() with a direct call to >> pm_genpd_poweroff_unused(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 3 ++- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 6 ------ >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c | 6 ------ >> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c >> b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c >> index 8ae4797..09e6898 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c >> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ >> #include >> #include >> #include >> +#include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> @@ -324,7 +325,7 @@ void __init exynos_init_late(void) >> /* to be supported later */ >> return; >> >> - exynos_pm_late_initcall(); >> + pm_genpd_poweroff_unused(); >> } >> >> static int __init exynos_fdt_map_chipid(unsigned long node, const char >> *uname, >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h >> b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h >> index ff9b6a9..0c31b34 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h >> @@ -26,12 +26,6 @@ void exynos_init_late(void); >> >> void exynos_firmware_init(void); >> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS >> -int exynos_pm_late_initcall(void); >> -#else >> -static inline int exynos_pm_late_initcall(void) { return 0; } >> -#endif >> - >> extern struct smp_operations exynos_smp_ops; >> >> extern void exynos_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu); >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c >> b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c >> index ff50836..8fd2488 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c >> @@ -184,9 +184,3 @@ static __init int exynos4_pm_init_power_domain(void) >> return 0; >> } >> arch_initcall(exynos4_pm_init_power_domain); >> - >> -int __init exynos_pm_late_initcall(void) >> -{ >> - pm_genpd_poweroff_unused(); >> - return 0; >> -} > > Yes, right. Applied BTW, how about same thing in mach-s3c64xx? ;-) Good point, unfortunately I don't have time for it neither possibility to test. Hopefully someone else can handle that. > Thanks and Merry Christmas. Thank you for quick response. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.