From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: john.stultz@linaro.org (John Stultz) Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:28:31 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep In-Reply-To: References: <52C5E675.80701@linaro.org> <1388704274-5278-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> Message-ID: <52C755AF.5030402@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/02/2014 04:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:11 PM, John Stultz wrote: >> Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead >> use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep >> enabled seqcount methods. >> >> This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations >> as well, which will be utilized in a following patch. > Ack on this and on 2/2. I'm assuming I'll get them through the -tip > tree, which is where the problem came from. No? It seems Peter or Ingo are still on holiday. Hopefully they will be back on Monday to queue these. thanks -john