From: Sudeep.Holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: DT/kernel: fix arch_match_cpu_phys_id to avoid erroneous match
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 10:58:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CD2F5A.5000001@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140107165815.GF4180@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Hi Russell,
On 07/01/14 16:58, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just looking in devtree.c and I noticed this seems to have fallen
> by the wayside. Given that this fixes a possible bug and there have been
> no negative comments, I think it's good for mainline.
>
> Could you place this in the patch system, assuming Russell has no
> comments?
>
Can I put this in patch tracker if you have no objections ?
Regards,
Sudeep
> Cheers,
> Mark.
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:30:32PM +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
>>
>> The MPIDR contains specific bitfields(MPIDR.Aff{2..0}) which uniquely
>> identify a CPU, in addition to some non-identifying information and
>> reserved bits. The ARM cpu binding defines the 'reg' property to only
>> contain the affinity bits, and any cpu nodes with other bits set in
>> their 'reg' entry are skipped.
>>
>> As such it is not necessary to mask the phys_id with MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK,
>> and doing so could lead to matching erroneous CPU nodes in the device
>> tree. This patch removes the masking of the physical identifier.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
>> index f35906b..41960fb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
>> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ void __init arm_dt_init_cpu_maps(void)
>>
>> bool arch_match_cpu_phys_id(int cpu, u64 phys_id)
>> {
>> - return (phys_id & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK) == cpu_logical_map(cpu);
>> + return phys_id == cpu_logical_map(cpu);
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> --
>> 1.8.1.2
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-08 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-21 12:30 [PATCH] ARM: DT/kernel: fix arch_match_cpu_phys_id to avoid erroneous match Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2014-01-07 16:58 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-08 10:58 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2014-01-08 18:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-08 18:23 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CD2F5A.5000001@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).