From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cov@codeaurora.org (Christopher Covington) Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 14:13:16 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v8 4/6] arm64: introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT, PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING and pv_time_ops In-Reply-To: <1389206998-27875-4-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> References: <1389206998-27875-4-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Message-ID: <52CDA34C.2030605@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Stefano, On 01/08/2014 01:49 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT and PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING on ARM64. > Necessary duplication of paravirt.h and paravirt.c with ARM. > > The only paravirt interface supported is pv_time_ops.steal_clock, so no > runtime pvops patching needed. > > This allows us to make use of steal_account_process_tick for stolen > ticks accounting. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini > CC: will.deacon at arm.com > CC: nico at linaro.org > CC: marc.zyngier at arm.com > CC: cov at codeaurora.org > CC: arnd at arndb.de > CC: olof at lixom.net > CC: Catalin.Marinas at arm.com Looks good to me. Acked-by Christopher Covington While I don't think it should necessarily gate these changes, I wonder if at some point the config options could be consolidated across the various architectures using them. Regards, Christopher -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation.