From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@prisktech.co.nz (Tony Prisk) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 16:04:43 +1300 Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] ohci and ehci-platform clks, phy and dt support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52D2064B.3010103@prisktech.co.nz> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/01/14 11:30, Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2014, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 01/11/2014 12:50 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> On 01/11/2014 01:46 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> >>>> Here is v4 of my ohci and ehci-platform clks, phy and dt support patch-set, >>>> this version should be 100% ready for merging upstream. >>> I see you've decided to completely ignore my opinion. NAK, FWIW. >> I'm sorry but the whole prefix thing has become a thing of -ETOOMUCHBIKESHEDDING, >> everyone except you seems to be fine with mmio and and one point in time we >> need to make a decision and move forward. > If this isn't beating a dead horse... Maybe everyone can agree on a > name like ohci-generic or generic-ohci. That seems like a pretty good > description of the hardware that the platform driver can handle. > > Alan Stern I prefer the -generic option, although generic- is equally fine - Having said that, I don't really care if it's called mmio either (although this does seem less 'descriptive'). Regards Tony Prisk