From: al.stone@linaro.org (Al Stone)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 6/6] ACPI: make sure ECs do not use the ACPI global lock
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:46:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D47AC5.7080508@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1826710.CJqGCqohkh@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 01/10/2014 04:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, January 10, 2014 03:52:20 PM al.stone at linaro.org wrote:
>> From: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
>>
>> ACPI ECs (Embedded Controllers) are allowed to use the ACPI global
>> lock in legacy mode. Since there is no global lock in hardware
>> reduced mode, make sure that ECs cannot inadvertently use it with
>> older ACPI tables that may have defined an _GLK method for the
>> EC device. Since an individual lock can and should be defined for
>> each EC, access to each EC should still be properly controlled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/ec.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>> index ba5b56d..3f15110 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>> @@ -745,9 +745,17 @@ ec_parse_device(acpi_handle handle, u32 Level, void *context, void **retval)
>> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> return status;
>> ec->gpe = tmp;
>> - /* Use the global lock for all EC transactions? */
>> + /*
>> + * Use the global lock for all EC transactions?
>> + *
>> + * If ACPI is in hardware reduced mode, there is no global lock.
>> + * If a _GLK method is defined, it needs to be ignored, just
>> + * in case it returns "true", which could happen if the ASL is
>> + * written incorrectly.
>
> What is going to happen if it is defined and works correctly in turn?
If for any reason the ec->global_lock field is non-zero, then every
time an EC transaction is being run (acpi_ec_transaction()), there will
be an attempt to acquire the ACPI global lock in violation of the
definition of hardware reduced mode -- the spec says that there is
no ACPI global lock in this mode.
Since the ACPICA code acpi_acquire_global_lock() doesn't check if it
is in hardware reduced or not, it will go ahead and make the attempt.
And again, things will work, but we will not be in hardware reduced
mode by definition.
If the ACPICA code is compiled for hardware reduced only, then
acpi_acquire_global_lock() is properly stubbed out and we would
stay in compliance with the spec's definition of hardware reduced.
>> + */
>> tmp = 0;
>> - acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_GLK", NULL, &tmp);
>> + if (!acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware)
>> + acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_GLK", NULL, &tmp);
>> ec->global_lock = tmp;
>> ec->handle = handle;
>> return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
>>
>
--
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Linaro Enterprise Group
al.stone at linaro.org
-----------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-13 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-10 22:52 [PATCH v6 0/6] Hardware Reduced Mode Cleanup for ACPI al.stone at linaro.org
2014-01-10 22:52 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] ACPI: introduce CONFIG_ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY to enforce this ACPI mode al.stone at linaro.org
2014-01-10 23:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-10 23:13 ` Al Stone
2014-01-10 23:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-10 22:52 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] ACPI: bus master reload not supported in reduced HW mode al.stone at linaro.org
2014-01-10 22:52 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] ACPI: HW reduced mode does not allow use of the FADT sci_interrupt field al.stone at linaro.org
2014-01-10 23:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-13 22:28 ` Al Stone
2014-01-14 0:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-10 22:52 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] ACPI: in HW reduced mode, using FADT PM information is not allowed al.stone at linaro.org
2014-01-10 23:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-13 22:46 ` Al Stone
2014-01-14 0:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-10 22:52 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] ACPI: do not map/unmap memory regions for FADT entries in reduced HW mode al.stone at linaro.org
2014-01-10 23:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-13 23:07 ` Al Stone
2014-01-14 0:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-14 0:59 ` Al Stone
2014-01-14 17:18 ` Al Stone
2014-01-10 22:52 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] ACPI: make sure ECs do not use the ACPI global lock al.stone at linaro.org
2014-01-10 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-13 23:46 ` Al Stone [this message]
2014-01-10 23:25 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] Hardware Reduced Mode Cleanup for ACPI Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D47AC5.7080508@linaro.org \
--to=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).