[RFC 0/2] Early patches to get rid of meminfo

[lauraa@codeaurora.org (Laura Abbott)]

On 1/15/2014 10:03 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 15 January 2014 19:01, Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> On 1/15/2014 5:50 AM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Laura,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:55:20PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> With the move away from bootmem and the convergence on memblock, it seems
>>>> like meminfo should be deprecated as well to avoid duplication. This is
>>>> a first pass attempt to just use memblock and not have meminfo
>>>> integrated.
>>>> There is still a major issue in terms of actually specifying mem at location
>>>> on the command line but I wanted to send this out for some early feedback
>>>> before putting any more effort into this. I've done basic boot testing on
>>>> a simple DT target.
>>>
>>>
>>> I can't see 1/2 and 2/2 - either in my inbox or in the archive.
>>> Could you resend?
>>>
>>> /
>>>       Leif
>>
>>
>>
>> The patches are being held for moderation because apparently they have "a
>> suspicious header". Not sure how the cover letter made it through but the
>> patches didn't. If they don't get approved by end of the day I'll try
>> re-sending.
>>
>
> Hi Laura,
>
> This is a known issue that is triggered by the fact that the word
> PATCH is missing from your subject line.
> Could you resend but replace 'RFC' with 'RFC PATCH' ?
>

Thanks for catching that, I will resend.

Laura

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation