From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lauraa@codeaurora.org (Laura Abbott) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:32:03 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v3 4/6] arm: add early_ioremap support In-Reply-To: <1389325833-16535-5-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> References: <1389325833-16535-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <1389325833-16535-5-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> Message-ID: <52D72883.3020500@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 1/9/2014 7:50 PM, Mark Salter wrote: .... > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c > index 987a7f5..038fb75 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -887,6 +888,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > > parse_early_param(); > > + early_ioremap_init(); > + > sort(&meminfo.bank, meminfo.nr_banks, sizeof(meminfo.bank[0]), meminfo_cmp, NULL); > > early_paging_init(mdesc, lookup_processor_type(read_cpuid_id())); Any chance we could do this even earlier, say right after setup_processor? It would be nice to be able to do this while FDT scanning (I have a use case in mind, potential patches are in the works) > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c > index 580ef2d..bef59b9 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include "mm.h" > #include "tcm.h" > @@ -1405,6 +1406,7 @@ void __init paging_init(const struct machine_desc *mdesc) > { > void *zero_page; > > + early_ioremap_reset(); > build_mem_type_table(); > prepare_page_table(); > map_lowmem(); > Neither x86 nor arm64 get rid of existing mapping in paging_init. Is there a reason this needs to be here for arm? Are there concerns about alias mappings? Thanks, Laura -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation