From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:43:15 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 03/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce the skeleton of _PDC related
 for ARM64
In-Reply-To: <20140123161918.GA25927@localhost>
References: <1389961514-13562-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
 <1389961514-13562-4-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
 <52D93D4E.5020605@arm.com> <52DCEA66.90903@linaro.org>
 <20140123161918.GA25927@localhost>
Message-ID: <52E27C03.8090903@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 2014?01?24? 00:19, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:20:38AM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2014-1-17 22:25, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> On 17/01/14 12:24, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
>>>> @@ -89,6 +89,9 @@ void arch_cpu_idle_prepare(void)
>>>>   	local_fiq_enable();
>>>>   }
>>>>   
>>>> +unsigned long boot_option_idle_override = IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE;
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(boot_option_idle_override);
>>>> +
>>> This is what I mentioned in other email. Do we really foresee use of this in
>>> ARM64 or it's just added to avoid build issues ?
>> Just avoid build issues, can not foresee use of this in ARM64 :)
> So ideally we should look for a better solution here.

Ok, I will try my best.

Thanks
Hanjun