From: Sudeep.Holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: use num_possible_cpus() instead of NR_CPUS
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:11:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E78241.4020502@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001d01cf1bc9$452569d0$cf703d70$%han@samsung.com>
On 28/01/14 01:35, Jingoo Han wrote:
> Use num_possible_cpus() instead of direct use of NR_CPUS. Also,
> it fixes the following checkpatch warning.
>
> WARNING: usage of NR_CPUS is often wrong - consider using cpu_possible(), num_possible_cpus(), for_each_possible_cpu(), etc
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 10 +++++-----
> arch/arm64/mm/context.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index 1b7617a..09ff7d4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
> * cpu_logical_map was initialized to INVALID_HWID to
> * avoid matching valid MPIDR values.
> */
> - for (i = 1; (i < cpu) && (i < NR_CPUS); i++) {
> + for (i = 1; (i < cpu) && (i < num_possible_cpus()); i++) {
> if (cpu_logical_map(i) == hwid) {
> pr_err("%s: duplicate cpu reg properties in the DT\n",
> dn->full_name);
> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (cpu >= NR_CPUS)
> + if (cpu >= num_possible_cpus())
Have you tested this patch ? IIUC this will not work as cpu_possible mask is
populated completely and correctly only at the end of this function.
> goto next;
>
> if (cpu_read_ops(dn, cpu) != 0)
> @@ -368,9 +368,9 @@ next:
> }
>
> /* sanity check */
> - if (cpu > NR_CPUS)
> + if (cpu > num_possible_cpus())
> pr_warning("no. of cores (%d) greater than configured maximum of %d - clipping\n",
> - cpu, NR_CPUS);
> + cpu, num_possible_cpus());
>
> if (!bootcpu_valid) {
> pr_err("DT missing boot CPU MPIDR, not enabling secondaries\n");
> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ next:
> * All the cpus that made it to the cpu_logical_map have been
> * validated so set them as possible cpus.
> */
> - for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < num_possible_cpus(); i++)
> if (cpu_logical_map(i) != INVALID_HWID)
> set_cpu_possible(i, true);
This is what I am referring above, where is possible mask set before this.
If it's already populated correctly then we can remove this completely.
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-28 1:35 [PATCH 1/2] arm64: use num_possible_cpus() instead of NR_CPUS Jingoo Han
2014-01-28 1:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: kernel: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf() Jingoo Han
2014-01-28 15:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-29 4:54 ` Jingoo Han
2014-01-29 5:00 ` Joe Perches
2014-01-28 10:11 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2014-01-29 5:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: use num_possible_cpus() instead of NR_CPUS Jingoo Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E78241.4020502@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).