[RFC PATCH 08/15] ata: ahci_platform: Manage SATA PHY

[rogerq@ti.com (Roger Quadros)]

Hi,

On 09/23/2013 04:59 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 09/23/2013 03:59 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 23-09-2013 11:37, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>
>>>>>     Not sure why you asked -- I'm not using this driver, neither I'm
>>
>>>> Well, you have better grip of what's going on in the embedded world
>>>> than me.  I'm mostly curious whether adding dependency on PHY is okay.
>>
>>> There is no hard dependency on presence of PHY. The driver will continue
>>> as usual if devm_phy_get() fails.
>>> I hope selecting GENERIC_PHY in Kconfig is not an issue.
>>
>>    Selecting in the AHCI_PLATFORM section? It seems I have overlooked it. No, I don't think it's a good idea. The generic PHY functions seem to be stubbed when GENERIC_PHY=n.
>>
> OK I will remove the select then.

If I remove the select then build fails like so if we set CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY to 'm' and CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_PLATFORM to 'y'

drivers/built-in.o: In function `ahci_platform_enable_resources':
(.text+0x162647): undefined reference to `phy_init'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `ahci_platform_enable_resources':
(.text+0x16267c): undefined reference to `phy_power_on'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `ahci_platform_enable_resources':
(.text+0x162694): undefined reference to `phy_exit'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `ahci_platform_disable_resources':
(.text+0x1626af): undefined reference to `phy_power_off'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `ahci_platform_disable_resources':
(.text+0x1626b7): undefined reference to `phy_exit'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `ahci_platform_get_resources':
(.text+0x162768): undefined reference to `devm_phy_get'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1

This means we need to make CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_PLATFORM depend on CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY or
select it.

OR

Generic PHY layer must be fixed so that the API's are always built in.

What is the better option? I believe making the PHY API's always built in is the better option.

cheers,
-roger