[RFC PATCH] ARM: Add imprecise abort enable/disable macro

[ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk (Ben Dooks)]

On 10/02/14 08:50, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> On 02/07/2014 06:09 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:19:15PM +0000, Fabrice GASNIER wrote:
>>> This patch adds imprecise abort enable/disable macros.
>>> It also enables imprecise aborts when starting kernel.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h |   33
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   arch/arm/kernel/smp.c           |    1 +
>>>   arch/arm/kernel/traps.c         |    4 ++++
>>>   3 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h
>>> b/arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h
>>> index 3b763d6..82e3834 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h
>>> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
>>>   #define local_fiq_enable()  __asm__("cpsie f    @ __stf" : : :
>>> "memory", "cc")
>>>   #define local_fiq_disable() __asm__("cpsid f    @ __clf" : : :
>>> "memory", "cc")
>>> +
>>> +#define local_abt_enable()  __asm__("cpsie a    @ __sta" : : :
>>> "memory", "cc")
>>> +#define local_abt_disable() __asm__("cpsid a    @ __cla" : : :
>>> "memory", "cc")
>>>   #else
>>>   /*
>>> @@ -130,6 +133,36 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
>>>       : "memory", "cc");                    \
>>>       })
>>> +/*
>>> + * Enable Aborts
>>> + */
>>> +#define local_abt_enable()                    \
>>> +    ({                            \
>>> +        unsigned long temp;                \
>>> +    __asm__ __volatile__(                    \
>>> +    "mrs    %0, cpsr        @ sta\n"        \
>>> +"    bic    %0, %0, %1\n"                    \
>>> +"    msr    cpsr_c, %0"                    \
>>> +    : "=r" (temp)                        \
>>> +    : "r" (PSR_A_BIT)                    \
>> Can you use "i" instead of a register for this constant?
> Hi,
>
> Sure, I will change it in a future patch.
>>
>>> +    : "memory", "cc");                    \
>> You don't need the "cc" clobber.
> That surprises me: I think "orr" and "bic" instruction might change N
> and Z bits, depending on the result.
> So shouldn't "cc" be placed here ?
> I also see that it is used in local_fiq_enable/disable macros just
> above, that are similar:

No, only if they have the S flag set on the instruction (ORRS,BICS)


-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius