From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk (Ben Dooks) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:00:18 +0000 Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: Add imprecise abort enable/disable macro In-Reply-To: <52F892C8.80508@st.com> References: <1391789955-26927-1-git-send-email-fabrice.gasnier@st.com> <1391789955-26927-2-git-send-email-fabrice.gasnier@st.com> <20140207170903.GT5976@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <52F892C8.80508@st.com> Message-ID: <52F89522.6030302@codethink.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/02/14 08:50, Fabrice Gasnier wrote: > On 02/07/2014 06:09 PM, Will Deacon wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:19:15PM +0000, Fabrice GASNIER wrote: >>> This patch adds imprecise abort enable/disable macros. >>> It also enables imprecise aborts when starting kernel. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier >>> --- >>> arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h | 33 >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 1 + >>> arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 4 ++++ >>> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h >>> b/arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h >>> index 3b763d6..82e3834 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h >>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h >>> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void) >>> #define local_fiq_enable() __asm__("cpsie f @ __stf" : : : >>> "memory", "cc") >>> #define local_fiq_disable() __asm__("cpsid f @ __clf" : : : >>> "memory", "cc") >>> + >>> +#define local_abt_enable() __asm__("cpsie a @ __sta" : : : >>> "memory", "cc") >>> +#define local_abt_disable() __asm__("cpsid a @ __cla" : : : >>> "memory", "cc") >>> #else >>> /* >>> @@ -130,6 +133,36 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void) >>> : "memory", "cc"); \ >>> }) >>> +/* >>> + * Enable Aborts >>> + */ >>> +#define local_abt_enable() \ >>> + ({ \ >>> + unsigned long temp; \ >>> + __asm__ __volatile__( \ >>> + "mrs %0, cpsr @ sta\n" \ >>> +" bic %0, %0, %1\n" \ >>> +" msr cpsr_c, %0" \ >>> + : "=r" (temp) \ >>> + : "r" (PSR_A_BIT) \ >> Can you use "i" instead of a register for this constant? > Hi, > > Sure, I will change it in a future patch. >> >>> + : "memory", "cc"); \ >> You don't need the "cc" clobber. > That surprises me: I think "orr" and "bic" instruction might change N > and Z bits, depending on the result. > So shouldn't "cc" be placed here ? > I also see that it is used in local_fiq_enable/disable macros just > above, that are similar: No, only if they have the S flag set on the instruction (ORRS,BICS) -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius