From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (Tomi Valkeinen) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:12:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] video: xilinxfb: Move xilinxfb_platform_data directly to the driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52FA21CF.1040809@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/02/14 08:48, Michal Simek wrote: > No reason to have separate file in header in include/linux folder > if this is purely driver specific structure. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek > --- > > I have this patch in my devel tree for a while and would like > to hear your opinion. I can't see any reason to have > xilinxfb_platform_data in header if this is purely OF driver > used on OF archs. > --- > drivers/video/xilinxfb.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- > include/linux/xilinxfb.h | 30 ------------------------------ > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 include/linux/xilinxfb.h Thanks. Queued for 3.15. Tomi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 901 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: