From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nm@ti.com (Nishanth Menon) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:41:10 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: OMAP2+: Fix boot with multi_v7_defconfig In-Reply-To: <52FA3531.8090308@redhat.com> References: <1392055835-6494-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <52FA2B4F.3010408@ti.com> <52FA3102.7080407@ti.com> <52FA3531.8090308@redhat.com> Message-ID: <52FA3686.5080800@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 02/11/2014 08:35 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 02/11/2014 03:17 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> On 02/11/2014 07:53 AM, Roger Quadros wrote: >>> On 02/10/2014 08:10 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>> The OMAP EHCI controller is not compatible with the EHCI >>>> platform HCD driver so don't claim that we are. >>>> >>>> This fixes boot on OMAP platforms with CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD_PLATFORM=y >>>> e.g. multi_v7_defconfig >>>> >>>> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon >>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros >>> >>> Please ignore this patch as Hans has agreed to do a more proper fix in >>> >>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.hardware.netbook.arm.sunxi/7015 >> umm.. even then, drivers/usb/host/ehci-ppc-of.c claims compatibility >> with usb,ehci -> and we wont function with that driver either. > > Right, but that has never been an issue as no kernel will ever include > both ppc and omap support. Conceptually, we have compatibility string today in dts description that maps a driver that cant ever handle the device. I dont have strong opinions either way.. just something i noticed with a git grep.. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon