From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC10C433E0 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:49:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E9A964E86 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:49:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1E9A964E86 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=canonical.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=28ytipka6KXNJ/ow+hq+lzbFTbThxCi8k8erEuGlLoY=; b=PFJfmC0Sr68iKf0foQ1keYZIk NExed+BpGK4zXJ3tDmolGhttfolhkRhk1rqLwni80sL1OFJO71QN9yyzXwyEXFB3H6w1jHdQdSZ1X pwi1TaswTBmy1Ba2J1mk8bAWEQ8u8iUb8r+U594nXqyr1Xe7GdiJFKRtMCk0iHCRivABe7fT0Zo1f 1eoes+ASdVq6El5XReyJO9ID0HUpDxb9edd2EAQjOnjtPENOJ7RWUkIjoDho/0Ayp5T/AbGsZoz5H wRVfe313hyp034qrDsfijfp1OpKAvf+Mx9Q78K0LuudHqsY9ji6EVllKjkY2OVMMWo71/fpwGrMA9 kZh/ZTUHw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lK13r-00798N-Lg; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:47:47 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lK13o-00797o-5n for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:47:45 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com ([209.85.221.71]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lK13n-0004Ib-54 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:47:43 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id e13so8159823wrg.4 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:47:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yFz6dzZZeHtwfAjkcR+5KOfHHzaYWeftITQqDuozS6s=; b=XSiOt4jCEaarzVlUocVLo1WhNRsNtWrBA60yib/T8XeINpdXjDdsJ4aXqrrSsfcCqC IphWkKNmmDq1pWYjzQC3zabCI6zd0Rcw4kxKXMrrccr0oISs1tid2t7DnZ9DCoDlkZHm naTIPYRbHzaEevJF9ID+CB8eL6RQB5nG2i+ie7qMSmU684eOPGmQKjhgNU6dAgzEUdWH 8o+Ba4uJAzqVeZH3aN4wGsFAPOZ7ZgvlAt61zQ+JPuOI89swvxgPNnRHfTtD+q6rIE5P BH5VyRfHZpirFfl7058hfj9ko8xTijwVJrRs4Kal1n+AO1vfVbHgmaOLXwwQmHPFo7hP Ko8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+G21HpuGUkdP1V+pEfWb8xsHu8pFlwvo0I4t1y78HiesMcshU 1QBQ2+lTkwqlp2FBDLTqAPSkOkvUE9L1viQDLUJkg0GakItjzpPncWUiXWAkr0yDaAiQJEiRxFY ZSeJicaioijZfLLIbg/Lb+nlmgoNk29S3d2nBOHoXeAbpIX+1gXZT X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:245:: with SMTP id m5mr4302687wrz.284.1615391262920; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:47:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzOKdQu1Zo+KUna4pwaQZuaYLADylFjwZtUs6uPbYZncoy6CBJ+ZAg4yMoz8Ix7vWin+JBTOQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:245:: with SMTP id m5mr4302666wrz.284.1615391262790; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:47:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.116] (adsl-84-226-167-205.adslplus.ch. [84.226.167.205]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n6sm30989558wrt.1.2021.03.10.07.47.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:47:42 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/5] arm64: socfpga: rename ARCH_STRATIX10 to ARCH_SOCFPGA64 To: Arnd Bergmann List-Id: Cc: Tom Rix , Lee Jones , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Dinh Nguyen , Rob Herring , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Moritz Fischer , Linux ARM , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , DTML , linux-clk , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, Networking , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, arm-soc , SoC Team , Olof Johansson References: <20210310083327.480837-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <20210310083840.481615-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <20210310094527.GA701493@dell> <35c39c81-08e4-24c8-f683-2fa7a7ea71de@redhat.com> <1c06cb74-f0b0-66e5-a594-ed1ee9bc876e@canonical.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Message-ID: <52d0489f-0f77-76a2-3269-e3004c6b6c07@canonical.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:47:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210310_154744_286196_9A726B33 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.26 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 10/03/2021 16:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:06 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski > wrote: >> On 10/03/2021 15:45, Tom Rix wrote: >>> On 3/10/21 1:45 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >> >> Many other architectures do not have vendor prefix (TEGRA, EXYNOS, >> ZYNQMP etc). I would call it the same as in ARMv7 - ARCH_SOCFPGA - but >> the Altera EDAC driver depends on these symbols to be different. >> Anyway, I don't mind using something else for the name. > > I agree the name SOCFPGA is confusing, since it is really a class of > device that is made by multiple manufacturers rather than a brand name, > but renaming that now would be equally confusing. If the Intel folks > could suggest a better name that describes all products in the platform > and is less ambiguous, we could rename it to that. I think ARCH_ALTERA > would make sense, but I don't know if that is a name that is getting > phased out. (We once renamed the Marvell Orion platform to ARCH_MVEBU, > but shortly afterwards, Marvell renamed their embedded business unit (EBU) > and the name has no longer made sense since). I wait then for some ideas from Dinh (or anyone else). > > Regardless of what name we end up with, I do think we should have the > same name for 32-bit and 64-bit and instead fix the edac driver to do > runtime detection based on the compatible string. I can rename ARCH_SOCFPGA on 32-bit ARM as well, however converting edac driver from #ifdef ARCH_SOCFPGA64 to proper compatible string will be too much for me: I am not able to test it. This edac Altera driver is very weird... it uses the same compatible differently depending whether this is 32-bit or 64-bit (e.g. Stratix 10)! On ARMv7 the compatible means for example one IRQ... On ARMv8, we have two. It's quite a new code (2019 from Intel), not some ancient legacy, so it should never have been accepted... Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel