From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:00:49 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: Exynos: Add generic compatible string In-Reply-To: <530BE93F.2070904@gmail.com> References: <1392809645-631-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org> <53075239.4010603@samsung.com> <2200834.G3JJLYQl5i@wuerfel> <53076F00.7000001@samsung.com> <53077160.5030202@samsung.com> <530BE557.20106@samsung.com> <530BE93F.2070904@gmail.com> Message-ID: <530BEB41.5070107@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 02/25/14 09:52, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 25.02.2014 01:35, Kukjin Kim wrote: [...] >> Well, let me see common.c and mach-exynos.c, one is for SoC specific >> stuff and the other is for Board specific so I think, keeping current >> file would be good, we can change the file name mach-exynos.c or >> board-exynos.c though. > > There is no board specific stuff in mach-exynos/ with DT, so there is no > need to keep those file separate, especially when stuff from common.c is > constantly being (re)moved. > OK. > Also I'd rather stick to what other platforms use, which would be > exynos.c (like tegra.c), as Arnd proposed. > agreed. OK. - Kukjin