linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lauraa@codeaurora.org (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: arm64 cache maintenance on read only address loops forever
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:59:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <530D74C2.4000402@codeaurora.org> (raw)

Hi,

On arm64, set_pte_at currently write protects user ptes that are not 
dirty. The expected behavior is that the fault handler will fix this up 
on a write to the address. do_page_fault will not mark the fault as a 
write though if ESR has the CM (cache maintenance) bit set. This has the 
unfortunate side effect that if cache maintenance is performed on a user 
address that has not yet been marked as dirty, handle_mm_fault may 
return without actually adjusting the pte or returning an error. This 
means that the fault will be infinitely retried.

Calling cache maintenance on an address that hasn't actually been 
written to isn't all that useful but looping forever seems like a poor 
result. It seems like the check in do_page_fault is too restrictive and 
we need to be able to fault in pages via cache maintenance.

Thoughts?

Thanks,
Laura

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

             reply	other threads:[~2014-02-26  4:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-26  4:59 Laura Abbott [this message]
2014-02-26 13:55 ` arm64 cache maintenance on read only address loops forever Will Deacon
2014-02-26 21:40   ` Laura Abbott
2014-02-27 18:15     ` Will Deacon
2014-02-26 14:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-02-26 22:00   ` Laura Abbott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=530D74C2.4000402@codeaurora.org \
    --to=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).