linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: acourbot@nvidia.com (Alexandre Courbot)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:12:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <530D77B0.8080807@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530D754A.60700@wwwdotorg.org>

On 02/26/2014 02:02 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/25/2014 09:58 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> On 02/26/2014 07:38 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 02/24/2014 07:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>>> On 02/25/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>>> On 02/24/2014 03:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>>>>> Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is
>>>>>> still minimal with no display option (although HDMI should be easy
>>>>>> to get to work) and USB requiring external power.
> ...
>>>> For the Wifi chip, non-removable would be the correct setting
>>>> hardware-wise, but there is a trap: the chip has its reset line asserted
>>>> at boot-time, and you need to set GPIO 229 to de-assert it. Only after
>>>> that will the device be detected on the SDIO bus. Since it lacks a CD
>>>> line, it must be polled, hence the broken-cd property.
>>>
>>> How does that GPIO get manipulated right now? I assume you must be
>>> manually configuring it via sysfs after boot or something? If so,
>>> perhaps it's best to just leave out the WiFi node until it works
>>> automatically.
>>
>> The GPIO needs to be set from user-space, yes. But if we leave the Wifi
>> node out, I'm concerned that wireless will not be usable at all,
>> wouldn't it?
>
> True, but if we have no representation of the device in DT that works
> without manually enabling clocks and/or GPIOs, it's not a
> complete/accurate representation of the HW, so it doesn't make sense to
> add it to DT. Yes, I admit that sucks.

Well, I can always enable it in my out-of-tree branch until we can push 
the complete binding in mainline, so I'm ok with taking it out of this 
patch for now.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-26  5:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-24 10:26 [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD Alexandre Courbot
2014-02-24 18:53 ` Stephen Warren
2014-02-25  2:13   ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-02-25  9:52     ` Arend van Spriel
2014-02-26  4:52       ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-02-26 21:10         ` Arend van Spriel
2014-02-25 22:38     ` Stephen Warren
2014-02-26  4:58       ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-02-26  5:02         ` Stephen Warren
2014-02-26  5:12           ` Alexandre Courbot [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-03  3:49 Alexandre Courbot
2014-03-03  3:53 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-03-03 17:00 ` Stephen Warren
2014-03-04  1:24   ` Alexandre Courbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=530D77B0.8080807@nvidia.com \
    --to=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).