From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:58:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] ARM: zynq: cpufreq support
In-Reply-To: <3402bb7c-3dec-403a-9356-65af803e1b0a@AM1EHSMHS017.ehs.local>
References: <1392851684-29950-1-git-send-email-soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
<3402bb7c-3dec-403a-9356-65af803e1b0a@AM1EHSMHS017.ehs.local>
Message-ID: <53103383.8090604@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org
On 02/27/2014 06:52 PM, S?ren Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi Daniel, Michal,
>
> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 03:14PM -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> another iteration of this series. The patches are the same as in v3, but
>> the series shrank a bit. I rebased this series on tip/timers/core, hence
>> the two patches for the clockevent core fell out, since Thomas already
>> applied those.
>> Additionally I removed the patch 'clocksource/cadence_ttc: Use only one
>> counter'. Thomas brought up some questions regarding that patch which
>> need to be investigated. Since it is not required for the rest of this
>> series, I just dropped it for now.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> S?ren
>>
>> Soren Brinkmann (4):
>> clocksource/cadence_ttc: Call clockevents_update_freq() with IRQs
>> enabled
>> clocksource/cadence_ttc: Overhaul clocksource frequency adjustment
>> arm: zynq: Don't use arm_global_timer with cpufreq
>> arm: zynq: Add support for cpufreq
>
> Any comments? I think most of these should be pretty straight forward
> and it would be nice to get some ACKs - or tell me what's wrong. :)
> 'clocksource/cadence_ttc: Overhaul clocksource frequency adjustment'
> might deserve a more thorough review.
Hi Soren,
I will be at Linaro Connect. Give me a couple of days, I will review
them again.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook |
Twitter |
Blog