From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 12:33:07 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: kernel: respect device tree status of cpu nodes In-Reply-To: <1393240960-31846-1-git-send-email-j@bitron.ch> References: <1393240960-31846-1-git-send-email-j@bitron.ch> Message-ID: <53178A03.3090004@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org +Lorenzo On 02/24/14 03:22, J?rg Billeter wrote: > Skip 'disabled' cpu nodes when building the cpu logical map. This avoids > booting cpus that have been disabled in the device tree. > > Signed-off-by: J?rg Billeter > Reviewed-by: Ben Dooks > --- > arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c > index 739c3df..9aed299 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c > @@ -95,6 +95,10 @@ void __init arm_dt_init_cpu_maps(void) > if (of_node_cmp(cpu->type, "cpu")) > continue; > > + /* Check if CPU is enabled */ > + if (!of_device_is_available(cpu)) > + continue; > + > pr_debug(" * %s...\n", cpu->full_name); > /* > * A device tree containing CPU nodes with missing "reg" This doesn't follow the ePAPR spec. According to ePAPR status="disabled" in a cpu node means "the cpu is in a quiescent state" and one can enable it by using the "enable-method". At the least, we should document this in bindings/arm/cpus.txt if we can all agree that we want this definition of disabled. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation