linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com (Dietmar Eggemann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 6/6] sched: ARM: create a dedicated scheduler topology table
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 22:38:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5317A77C.8020501@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394003906-11630-7-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

On 05/03/14 07:18, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Create a dedicated topology table for ARM which will create new level to
> differentiate CPUs that can or not powergate independantly from others.
> 
> The patch gives an example of how to add domain that will take advantage of
> SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm/kernel/topology.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> index 0bc94b1..ae8ffbc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -185,6 +185,15 @@ const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
>   	return &cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling;
>   }
>   
> +/*
> + * The current assumption is that we can power gate each core independently.
> + * This will be superseded by DT binding once available.
> + */
> +const struct cpumask *cpu_corepower_mask(int cpu)
> +{
> +	return &cpu_topology[cpu].thread_sibling;
> +}

Although you already explained this to me in a private conversation,
it's important to notice that running this set-up on a dual cluster TC2
(2 Cortex A15 - 3 Cortex A7) (no independent core power gating) we
don't see the SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN topology flag set in the sd's on MC
level because this patch-set doesn't contain the appropriate DT
parsing. Like you said back then, the comment above mentions this.

> +
>   static void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
>   {
>   	struct cputopo_arm *cpu_topo, *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
> @@ -266,6 +275,20 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
>   		cpu_topology[cpuid].socket_id, mpidr);
>   }
>   
> +static struct sched_domain_topology_level arm_topology[] = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
> +	{ cpu_corepower_mask, SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN, SD_INIT_NAME(GMC) },
> +	{ cpu_coregroup_mask, SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
> +#endif
> +	{ cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
> +	{ NULL, },
> +};
> +
> +static void __init set_sched_topology(void)
> +{
> +	sched_domain_topology = arm_topology;
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * init_cpu_topology is called at boot when only one cpu is running
>    * which prevent simultaneous write access to cpu_topology array
> @@ -289,4 +312,7 @@ void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
>   	smp_wmb();
>   
>   	parse_dt_topology();
> +
> +	/* Set scheduler topology descriptor */
> +	set_sched_topology();
>   }
> 

How about the core scheduler provides an interface set_sched_topology()
instead of each arch has its own __init function? Sketched out below
for ARM.

-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] sched: set_sched_topology() as an interface of core scheduler

---
 arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 7 +------
 include/linux/sched.h      | 2 +-
 kernel/sched/core.c        | 5 +++++
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
index ae8ffbc..89d5592 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
@@ -284,11 +284,6 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level arm_topology[] = {
 	{ NULL, },
 };
 
-static void __init set_sched_topology(void)
-{
-	sched_domain_topology = arm_topology;
-}
-
 /*
  * init_cpu_topology is called at boot when only one cpu is running
  * which prevent simultaneous write access to cpu_topology array
@@ -314,5 +309,5 @@ void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
 	parse_dt_topology();
 
 	/* Set scheduler topology descriptor */
-	set_sched_topology();
+	set_sched_topology(arm_topology);
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 8831413..fefd4e7 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ struct sched_domain_topology_level {
 #endif
 };
 
-extern struct sched_domain_topology_level *sched_domain_topology;
+extern void set_sched_topology(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
 # define SD_INIT_NAME(type)            .name = #type
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index b4fb0df..a748c92 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6105,6 +6105,11 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level default_topology[] = {
 
 struct sched_domain_topology_level *sched_domain_topology = default_topology;
 
+void set_sched_topology(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl)
+{
+	sched_domain_topology = tl;
+}
+
 #define for_each_sd_topology(tl)                       \
        for (tl = sched_domain_topology; tl->mask; tl++)
 
-- 
1.8.3.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-05 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-05  7:18 [RFC 0/6] rework sched_domain topology description Vincent Guittot
2014-03-05  7:18 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched: rework of sched_domain topology definition Vincent Guittot
2014-03-05 17:09   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-06  8:32     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-11 10:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-11 13:27         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-11 13:48           ` Dietmar Eggemann
     [not found] ` <1394003906-11630-7-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
2014-03-05 22:38   ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2014-03-06  8:42     ` [RFC 6/6] sched: ARM: create a dedicated scheduler topology table Vincent Guittot
2014-03-05 23:17 ` [RFC 0/6] rework sched_domain topology description Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-06  9:04   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-06 12:31     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-07  2:47       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-08 12:40         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-10 13:21           ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-11 13:17           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-12 13:28             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-12 13:47               ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-13 14:07                 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-17 11:52               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-19 19:15                 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-20  8:28                   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-11 13:08         ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found] ` <1394003906-11630-5-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
2014-03-11 10:08   ` [RFC 4/6] sched: powerpc: create a dedicated topology table Preeti U Murthy
2014-03-11 13:18     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-12  4:42       ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-03-12  7:44         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-12 11:04           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-14  2:30             ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-03-14  2:14           ` Preeti U Murthy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5317A77C.8020501@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).