From: jic23@kernel.org (Jonathan Cameron)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: at91_adc: Repair broken platform_data support
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 19:15:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5318C950.7060900@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394038675-15809-2-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
On 05/03/14 16:57, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Trying to use the at91_adc driver while not using device tree is ending up in a
> kernel crash:
>
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004
> [...]
> [<c01f3510>] (at91_adc_probe) from [<c0183828>] (platform_drv_probe+0x18/0x48)
> [<c0183828>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c01824a4>] (driver_probe_device+0x100/0x218)
> [<c01824a4>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0182648>] (__driver_attach+0x8c/0x90)
> [<c0182648>] (__driver_attach) from [<c0180de4>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x88)
> [<c0180de4>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c0181c7c>] (bus_add_driver+0xd4/0x1d4)
> [<c0181c7c>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c0182c40>] (driver_register+0x78/0xf4)
> [<c0182c40>] (driver_register) from [<c0008998>] (do_one_initcall+0xe8/0x14c)
> [<c0008998>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c02f0b50>] (kernel_init_freeable+0xec/0x1b4)
> [<c02f0b50>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c022acdc>] (kernel_init+0x8/0xe4)
> [<c022acdc>] (kernel_init) from [<c0009670>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24)
>
> This is because the at91_adc_caps structure is mandatory but is not filled when
> using platform_data. Correct that by using an id_table. It ensues that the
> driver will not match "at91_adc" anymore but it was crashing anyway.
>
> Fixes: c46016665fff (iio: at91: ADC start-up time calculation changed since at91sam9x5)
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org # v3.13+
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Ouch.
It's late in the cycle so I'll send this on to Greg KH with a note
to say either send it to Linus if he is happy doing so - or send
it early in 3.15, then it'll get picked up for stable.
I'll give it a day or so to see if I the at91 maintainers are happy
with the other two parts as it is probably cleaner if all 3 go together.
Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> index 5b1aa027c034..bbba014c9939 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> @@ -765,14 +765,17 @@ static int at91_adc_probe_pdata(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> if (!pdata)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + st->caps = (struct at91_adc_caps *)
> + platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
> +
> st->use_external = pdata->use_external_triggers;
> st->vref_mv = pdata->vref;
> st->channels_mask = pdata->channels_used;
> - st->num_channels = pdata->num_channels;
> + st->num_channels = st->caps->num_channels;
> st->startup_time = pdata->startup_time;
> st->trigger_number = pdata->trigger_number;
> st->trigger_list = pdata->trigger_list;
> - st->registers = pdata->registers;
> + st->registers = &st->caps->registers;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1101,7 +1104,6 @@ static int at91_adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> static struct at91_adc_caps at91sam9260_caps = {
> .calc_startup_ticks = calc_startup_ticks_9260,
> .num_channels = 4,
> @@ -1154,11 +1156,27 @@ static const struct of_device_id at91_adc_dt_ids[] = {
> {},
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at91_adc_dt_ids);
> -#endif
> +
> +static const struct platform_device_id at91_adc_ids[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "at91sam9260-adc",
> + .driver_data = (unsigned long)&at91sam9260_caps,
> + }, {
> + .name = "at91sam9g45-adc",
> + .driver_data = (unsigned long)&at91sam9g45_caps,
> + }, {
> + .name = "at91sam9x5-adc",
> + .driver_data = (unsigned long)&at91sam9x5_caps,
> + }, {
> + /* terminator */
> + }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, at91_adc_ids);
>
> static struct platform_driver at91_adc_driver = {
> .probe = at91_adc_probe,
> .remove = at91_adc_remove,
> + .id_table = at91_adc_ids,
> .driver = {
> .name = DRIVER_NAME,
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(at91_adc_dt_ids),
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-06 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-05 16:57 [PATCH 0/3] iio: adc: at91 fixes Alexandre Belloni
2014-03-05 16:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: at91_adc: Repair broken platform_data support Alexandre Belloni
2014-03-06 19:15 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2014-03-12 10:57 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-03-12 17:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-03-05 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: at91: at91sam9g45: change at91_adc name Alexandre Belloni
2014-03-06 19:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-03-10 13:26 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-03-15 15:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-04-22 21:49 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-04-23 0:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-03-05 16:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91: at91sam9260: " Alexandre Belloni
2014-03-06 7:28 ` [PATCH 0/3] iio: adc: at91 fixes Josh Wu
2014-03-10 10:52 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5318C950.7060900@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).