From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] clk/exynos5260: add clock file for exynos5260
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:59:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <531D007F.4030800@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531AE1CD.2070203@samsung.com>
On 08.03.2014 10:24, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
> I modified code as per our discussion and addressed all comments
> including moving fixed clock to DT
> and found it's working well, so we can now finalize which way to go ahead.
> Following is some data between V4 and probable next version, which might
> help in making decision.
>
> drivers/clk/samsung/exynos5260-clock.c
>
> Before Change
> LoC: 1890
> size drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 14226 14956 0 29182 71fe
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.o
>
> After Change:
> LoC: 1806
> size drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 15446 14544 0 29990 7526
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.o
Well, somehow I've been under impression that the change would bring
more significant results. Here we can see slight reduction in lines of
code, but also slight increase of kernel image size. Still, in general,
nothing extreme.
In this case I'd probably go with Rahul's original code, as it doesn't
require second matching and separate match table, which adds redundant
compatible strings used just for this extra matching pass.
I guess this is all just bike shedding, though.
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-09 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-06 13:45 [PATCH v4 5/5] clk/exynos5260: add clock file for exynos5260 Rahul Sharma
2014-03-07 13:56 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-03-07 14:12 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-03-07 15:10 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-03-07 15:22 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-03-07 19:20 ` Rahul Sharma
2014-03-08 9:24 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-03-09 23:59 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2014-03-10 2:10 ` Rahul Sharma
2014-03-07 18:41 ` Rahul Sharma
2014-03-08 4:53 ` Pankaj Dubey
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-04 11:12 [PATCH v4 0/5] clk: exynos: add support for exynos5260 SoC Rahul Sharma
2014-03-04 11:12 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] clk/exynos5260: add clock file for exynos5260 Rahul Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=531D007F.4030800@gmail.com \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).