From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (Tomi Valkeinen) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:43:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/9] Doc/DT: Add DT binding documentation for DVI Connector In-Reply-To: <1393604717.3802.61.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de> References: <1393590016-9361-1-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> <1393590016-9361-4-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> <20140228155937.GQ21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1393604717.3802.61.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <531EB086.8040404@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 28/02/14 18:25, Philipp Zabel wrote: > dvi-connector { > compatible = "dvi-connector"; > ddc-i2c-bus = <&i2c3>; > > port { > dvi_d_in: endpoint at 0 { > remote-endpoint = <&sii902x_out>; > }; > dvi_a_in: endpoint at 1 { > remote-endpoint = <&tve_out>; > }; > }; > }; > > It should be possible to let the connector know that those two endpoints > are connected to a TMDS source and to a VGA source, respectively. I have not worked with boards that would have the analog part, so just wondering about the above. The above would mean that either digital or analog is in use, but not both. Was that the intention? From the connector's perspective, the analog and digital pins are separate, and I think they can be used at the same time. That kind of sounds like the analog and digital pins should be represented as separate ports. Tomi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 901 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: