From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: krzk@kernel.org (Krzysztof Kozlowski) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:50:52 +0200 Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the arm-soc tree In-Reply-To: <20160905111948.553487be@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20160905111948.553487be@canb.auug.org.au> Message-ID: <531f80d6-4cf6-ae83-7cb6-e002a6e8f63f@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/05/2016 03:19 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in: > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi > > between commit: > > 585dcacac6bb ("arm64: dts: Fix broken architected timer interrupt trigger") > > from the arm-soc tree and commit: > > 36d1c9cd07cd ("arm64: dts: exynos: Use human-friendly symbols for timer interrupt flags") > > from the samsung-krzk tree. > > I fixed it up (I *think* - see below) and can carry the fix as > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer > when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any > particularly complex conflicts. The fix is correct, for the record: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Merge conflict was (unfortunately) expected. In general, the multiple-platform-at-once patches are conflict prone. Especially in this case, Marc's patch ("arm64: dts: Fix broken architected...") could be split per architecture. Best regards, Krzysztof