From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com (Boris BREZILLON) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:59:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v5 3/9] at91: pinctrl: don't request GPIOs used for interrupts but lock them as IRQ In-Reply-To: <1393841162-25339-4-git-send-email-jjhiblot@traphandler.com> References: <1393841162-25339-1-git-send-email-jjhiblot@traphandler.com> <1393841162-25339-4-git-send-email-jjhiblot@traphandler.com> Message-ID: <53205A46.6000304@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi JJ, IIRC this patch was necessary for the DM9000 device, which is not defined in this series anymore. And, correct me if I'm wrong, but there's still a discussion about how this should be fixed properly (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/25/388). As a result, shouldn't we remove this patch from this series ? Best Regards, Boris Le 03/03/2014 11:05, Jean-Jacques Hiblot a ?crit : > During the xlate stage of the DT interrupt parsing, the at91 pinctrl driver > requests the GPIOs that are described as interrupt sources. This prevents a > driver to request the gpio later to get its electrical value. > This patch replaces the gpio_request with a gpio_lock_as_irq to prevent the > gpio to be set as an ouput while allowing a subsequent gpio_request to succeed > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot > --- > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c > index d990e33..db55b96 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c > @@ -1478,18 +1478,17 @@ static int at91_gpio_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d, > { > struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = d->host_data; > int ret; > - int pin = at91_gpio->chip.base + intspec[0]; > > if (WARN_ON(intsize < 2)) > return -EINVAL; > *out_hwirq = intspec[0]; > *out_type = intspec[1] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK; > > - ret = gpio_request(pin, ctrlr->full_name); > + ret = gpio_lock_as_irq(&at91_gpio->chip, intspec[0]); > if (ret) > return ret; > > - ret = gpio_direction_input(pin); > + ret = at91_gpio_direction_input(&at91_gpio->chip, intspec[0]); > if (ret) > return ret; >