From: lauraa@codeaurora.org (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM64: Kernel managed pages are only flushed
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:12:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5320BFAF.2030603@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140312172642.GU17083@arm.com>
On 3/12/2014 10:26 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 04:03:40PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:56:53PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:41:31PM +0000, Bharat.Bhushan at freescale.com wrote:
>>>> Did you get the chance to look into this? What is your take for this patch
>>>> or you want to suggest some other solution?
>>>
>>> See my reply to Laura here:
>>>
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/238510.html
>>>
>>> We *really* don't want executable device mappings.
>>
>> /dev/mem mapping use pgprot_noncached() but I think we could generalise
>> any of the writecombine and dmacoherent mappings to XN like in the patch
>> below:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index b524dcd17243..2d3cede62709 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -286,11 +286,11 @@ static inline int has_transparent_hugepage(void)
>> * Mark the prot value as uncacheable and unbufferable.
>> */
>> #define pgprot_noncached(prot) \
>> - __pgprot_modify(prot, PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_DEVICE_nGnRnE))
>> + __pgprot_modify(prot, PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_DEVICE_nGnRnE) | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN)
>> #define pgprot_writecombine(prot) \
>> - __pgprot_modify(prot, PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL_NC))
>> + __pgprot_modify(prot, PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL_NC) | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN)
>> #define pgprot_dmacoherent(prot) \
>> - __pgprot_modify(prot, PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL_NC))
>> + __pgprot_modify(prot, PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL_NC) | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN)
>> #define __HAVE_PHYS_MEM_ACCESS_PROT
>> struct file;
>> extern pgprot_t phys_mem_access_prot(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn,
>
> And one more patch as suggested by Steve Capper. Both would be needed.
>
> -------------8<----------------------
>
> From 31d84855d71778e4a0f615f61ab836be3a70a58b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:28:09 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Do not synchronise I and D caches for special ptes
>
> Special pte mappings are not intended to be executable and do not even
> have an associated struct page. This patch ensures that we do not call
> __sync_icache_dcache() on such ptes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Reported-by: Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 2d3cede62709..72c9ac38cdd9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static inline void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
> {
> if (pte_valid_user(pte)) {
> - if (pte_exec(pte))
> + if (!pte_special(pte) && pte_exec(pte))
> __sync_icache_dcache(pte, addr);
> if (pte_dirty(pte) && pte_write(pte))
> pte_val(pte) &= ~PTE_RDONLY;
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
Both let my simple test case pass (remap_pfn_range on io memory).
You can add my Tested-by to both patches.
Thanks,
Laura
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-12 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-05 11:20 [PATCH] ARM64: Kernel managed pages are only flushed Bharat Bhushan
2014-03-06 6:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-06 9:33 ` Bharat.Bhushan at freescale.com
2014-03-12 14:41 ` Bharat.Bhushan at freescale.com
2014-03-12 14:56 ` Will Deacon
2014-03-12 16:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-12 17:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-12 20:12 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2014-03-13 11:00 ` Bharat.Bhushan at freescale.com
2014-03-26 3:16 ` Bharat.Bhushan at freescale.com
2014-03-27 10:55 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5320BFAF.2030603@codeaurora.org \
--to=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).