From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com (Sergei Shtylyov) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:21:59 +0400 Subject: [PATCH v3][ 3/9] usb: chipidea: Use standard usb-phy property. In-Reply-To: <171967ece1414f9ba0e80664777892cb@BL2PR03MB226.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <1394618518-13803-1-git-send-email-denis@eukrea.com> <1394618518-13803-3-git-send-email-denis@eukrea.com> <5321CF4B.9000308@cogentembedded.com> <171967ece1414f9ba0e80664777892cb@BL2PR03MB226.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> Message-ID: <5322E657.8030905@cogentembedded.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello. On 14-03-2014 5:57, Peter Chen wrote: >>> According to Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.1.pdf "ethernet-phy" is the node >>> name, it is the same with Sergei's suggestion. >> Nobody's talking about "ehternet-phy" here. > Hmm, you take "ethernet-phy" as an example, and suggest changing to "usb-phy" at last email. Then it's a wrong mail. I'm not mixing nodes and properties. >>> But you have changed the property name at this patch, in fact, >> "fsl,usbphy" >>> is ok for property name, "fsl,usb-phy" may be better, but not worth a >>> patch to change it. >> No, it's not better and both are not OK because they're still >> Freescale specific while the de-facto standard property "usb-phy" is >> already used by other USB drivers for the same purpose. > Am I missing something, property name should be the same for all platforms? If they're doing the same standard thing, yes. > Peter WBR, Sergei