From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:43:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v11 15/27] iommu/exynos: use convenient macro to handle gate clocks In-Reply-To: <20140314140951.3d443a3096e80297c9fecef0@samsung.com> References: <20140314140951.3d443a3096e80297c9fecef0@samsung.com> Message-ID: <5323078E.4060903@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi KyongHo, On 14.03.2014 06:09, Cho KyongHo wrote: > exynos-iommu driver must care about master H/W's gate clock as well as > System MMU's gate clock. To enhance readability of the source code, > macros to gate/ungate those clocks are defined. > > Signed-off-by: Cho KyongHo > --- > drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c > index 71e77f1..cef62d0 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c > @@ -101,6 +101,16 @@ > #define REG_PB1_SADDR 0x054 > #define REG_PB1_EADDR 0x058 > > +#define __clk_gate_ctrl(data, clk, en) do { \ > + if (data->clk) \ > + clk_##en##able(data->clk); \ > + } while (0) > + > +#define __sysmmu_clk_enable(data) __clk_gate_ctrl(data, clk, en) > +#define __sysmmu_clk_disable(data) __clk_gate_ctrl(data, clk, dis) > +#define __master_clk_enable(data) __clk_gate_ctrl(data, clk_master, en) > +#define __master_clk_disable(data) __clk_gate_ctrl(data, clk_master, dis) > + I'd say that such macros only obfuscate code, without any gains, as you can see in diffstat - this patch adds more lines than it removes. Please drop this change. Best regards, Tomasz