From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:09:54 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL 5/6] Samsung PM updates for v3.15 In-Reply-To: References: <8259832.260591393840570438.JavaMail.weblogic@epml16> <20140309183523.GD22881@quad.lixom.net> <531CFA28.9020600@gmail.com> Message-ID: <53273A72.2080402@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Mike, On 10.03.2014 01:08, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> On 09.03.2014 19:35, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:56:11AM +0000, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>> >>>> The following changes since commit >>>> 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72: >>>> >>>> Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800) >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git >>>> tags/samsung-pm-1 >>>> >>>> for you to fetch changes up to e11d919e4aa2009077e3e4f829ff991d37adca61: >>>> >>>> ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code (2014-02-14 >>>> 08:16:01 +0900) >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll >>> hold >>> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect >>> they'll be >>> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. >> >> >> I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK my >> own patches. ;) >> >> Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: >> >> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa > > Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :) > > I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the > other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said, > these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit. May we get your ACK for this? I hope it's not too late already to have them merged for 3.15. Best regards, Tomasz