From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (Tomi Valkeinen) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:33:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 6/9] Doc/DT: Add DT binding documentation for MIPI DSI CM Panel In-Reply-To: <4670830.fkS1noPxcd@avalon> References: <1393590016-9361-1-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> <1393590016-9361-7-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> <4670830.fkS1noPxcd@avalon> Message-ID: <5327E8D3.5010907@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 17/03/14 16:22, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> +Example >> +------- >> + >> +lcd0: display { >> + compatible = "tpo,taal", "panel-dsi-cm"; >> + label = "lcd0"; >> + >> + gpios = <&gpio4 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* 102, reset */ > > If the panel uses a TE GPIO but no reset GPIO, do you plan to express this > with a "hole" for the reset GPIO ? e.g. something like > > gpios = <0>, <&gpio4 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; Yes. > Wouldn't it be better to split the gpios property into "reset-gpios" and "te- > gpios" ? Yes, I can change it. I don't have a strong preference. I've gotten similar comments for other bindings also, so I guess the preferred way is to use named "-gpios" properties for everything except the case where you really have multiple gpios with the same purpose? The gpio binding documentation doesn't give much guidance on this. Tomi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 901 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: